WR, DE, DT or CB?
#1
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:19 PM
DT is about the rawest and shallow position on the team, yes they are overachieving a lot this year in run defense... but maybe thats because of how easy it is to pass when you have 2 players on the defensive line over achieving on stopping the run and ignoring the pass? Look what Gerald McCoy did for Tampa's pass rush.
If you go DE, you have 3 other players with high-picks invested in currently on your roster, but you get more pressure on the QB in 3rd and long (something we are sadly having trouble with). You could also try to bring in a FA.
If you go WR you have another weapon to help progress your sophomore QB with and something to replace your aging... and only star at the position... sadly you spent a pick last year on WR and a 2nd round pick this year. Again, you will have FA options here, look how important Vincent Jackson is to San Diego this year even though he is holding out.
Lastly, you could go CB in the first if Marshall walks, this would be my least favorite because.. well... really... there is no reason NOT to go FA here if you just invest a first round draft pick into DE.
#2
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:20 PM
#3
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:20 PM
#4
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:21 PM
We're 0-2, not 0-7.
Let's give these guys a shot to turn it around. They are profesionals and get paid a $h** ton of money to play this game.
I'm not saying were going to win a ton of games, but giving up after week two is pretty pathetic.
#5
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:22 PM
We need the most help at DT in my opinion. At good DT will make a CB better, it works the other way around as well (coverage sack) but it more frequently works from the DT making the CB better side of the equation (more pressure up front = less time in coverage). A good penetrating DT also makes the DE's better because it forces the QB out of the pocket and sets the DE's up for the sack.
I'm a Tarheel, so I'm hoping all this NCAA stuff with Marvin Austin causes him to slip down the draft boards right into our hands. I'd say we take the Tampa approach and draft two quality DT's to shore up our defense.
Edited by CatMan72, 20 September 2010 - 03:27 PM.
#6
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:24 PM
We need OL depth, but I would say CB. Marshall looks bad this year and we're getting exposed in the secondary, the guys upfront are doing well.
#7
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:24 PM
What would you draft in the first round?
DT is about the rawest and shallow position on the team, yes they are overachieving a lot this year in run defense... but maybe thats because of how easy it is to pass when you have 2 players on the defensive line over achieving on stopping the run and ignoring the pass? Look what Gerald McCoy did for Tampa's pass rush.
If you go DE, you have 3 other players with high-picks invested in currently on your roster, but you get more pressure on the QB in 3rd and long (something we are sadly having trouble with). You could also try to bring in a FA.
If you go WR you have another weapon to help progress your sophomore QB with and something to replace your aging... and only star at the position... sadly you spent a pick last year on WR and a 2nd round pick this year. Again, you will have FA options here, look how important Vincent Jackson is to San Diego this year even though he is holding out.
Lastly, you could go CB in the first if Marshall walks, this would be my least favorite because.. well... really... there is no reason NOT to go FA here if you just invest a first round draft pick into DE.
Was thinking about this last night.
WR or CB, depending on who's there. We're pretty hardcore about BPA.
WR: Easy answer as Smith is getting older and we haven't seen anything from the rookies that would suggest a possible #1 down the road. But, we just drafted 3 of them and they might want to ride Smith one more year to see what develops.
CB: Marshall is probably gone and isn't looking too hot anyhow. Captain is fine for a nickle but he's pretty much always going to get exposed against tall receivers/jump balls. Gamble is good, not great.
Also depends on who our coach will be. I do think they'll trade back and try to grab a 2nd somehow.
#8
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:25 PM
Wouldn't waste it on a WR, I would try to rectify that situation through free agency.
Better defensive line play would help the secondary a lot, so I would prefer to pick a defensive tackle that could collapse the pocket, and stop the run.
Edited by Davidson Deac II, 20 September 2010 - 03:35 PM.
#9
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:25 PM
#10
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:27 PM
#11
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:29 PM
#12
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:30 PM
#13
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:31 PM
#14
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:32 PM
bpa
Black Panthers Association?
You thinking of starting a revolution? If so I'm down.
#15
Posted 20 September 2010 - 03:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





