Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jpjr

Definition of "It" factor

25 posts in this topic

Reporter: "When do you feel you'll own the playbook?"

Clausen: "I already own the playbook."

(His response was very diplomatic after that but I love the confidence)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

***Clausen then picks up a copy of the playbook to show he has it***

Reporter: No, I know you own a copy of it. I mean when will you "own" the playbook?

Clausen: I told you, I already have it. See?

***Clausen picks up the playbook again***

Reporter: <sighs> Riiiiight.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy the 4 pages of plays we have....handoff, handoff, chuck it and prey...and on the 5 yard line we spread it out with Mike Goodson...genius!!

I think our opposing defenses have owned our playbook...A 12 year old who plays madden can scheme and situational play call better than what's sadly become a joke of an offensive staff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i just want to see what 'IT" can do on the field. i hope "IT's" enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He should be heads down in that playbook, not talking to reporters about said playbook.

C'mon Man!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is this from?
his interview with cowherd this morning. go to that thread and there is a link to the podcast somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jimmy: I can lead us to the superbowl:

Reporter: There is no "I" in team.

Jimmy: Yes there is...

tKKs5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.