Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Interesting note on this year's defense


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
42 replies to this topic

#1 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,710
  • Reputation: 16,139
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:05 AM

From Gantt: Future for Panthers coaches up in the air

About midway through the article...

The name that has garnered the most attention -- at least from an angry fanbase -- is defensive coordinator Mike Trgovac.

His job has been under scrutiny the last two years. The Herald reported in 2007 that coach John Fox had effectively taken over Trgovac's defense meetings early in the season (specifically after a Week 4 loss to Tampa Bay), though Fox denied at the time he was undercutting Trgovac's authority.

"No. Mike knows. He's the defensive coordinator," Fox said then. "He calls them on game day. No different than any coordinator I've had thus far in any phase. I think all our coordinators understand (the input). When you're the head coach, you're allowed to do that."

Several members of the organization (both players and from outside the locker room) confirmed that Fox did a similar thing this year, though it was closer to midseason when he began to exert his influence again.

Considering the defense's second-half collapse (against some of the league's top offenses), Trgovac's future has to be far from secure.

Putting 2 and 2 together, John Fox began paying more attention to the defense around mid-season.

And when did the defense start to decline?

Around the latter part of mid-season :confused5:

Thus, you can take two possible conclusions from this.


A) Fox's input wasn't helpful. Perhaps it was just "too many cooks spoil the broth" or maybe their ideas just didn't mesh well. For whatever reason, it didn't help and may, in fact, have hurt.

or

B) Trgovac was annoyed, resentful, nervous or some other adverse emotion because Fox was sticking his nose in for the second year in a row. These bad feelings affected his job performance in the latter half of the year.


Which of these sounds more plausible?

Edited by Mr Scot, 18 January 2009 - 02:07 AM.


#2 Kyle82

Kyle82

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,964
  • Reputation: 246
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:09 AM

It's all starting to make sense now........:iagree:

#3 Russell

Russell

    Stop the bleeding.

  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • PipPip
  • posts: 61
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:09 AM

From Gantt: Future for Panthers coaches up in the air

About midway through the article...


Putting 2 and 2 together, John Fox began paying more attention to the defense around mid-season.

And when did the defense start to decline?

Around the latter part of mid-season :confused5:

Thus, you can take two possible conclusions from this.


A) Fox's input wasn't helpful. Perhaps it was just "too many cooks spoil the broth" or maybe their ideas just didn't mesh well. For whatever reason, it didn't help and may, in fact, have hurt.

or

B) Trgovac was annoyed, resentful, nervous or some other adverse emotion because Fox was sticking his nose in for the second year in a row. These bad feelings affected his job performance in the latter half of the year.


Which of these sounds more plausible?

B sounds about right. I still would like both...at least Trgovac...to get jettisoned though.

#4 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,279
  • Reputation: 5,870
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:10 AM

is that why the playcalling was less creative in the second half than in the first?

#5 chris999

chris999

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,248
  • Reputation: 304
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:15 AM

i cant figure it out myself. in 2005, Our CBs played man coverage, and were very physical off the line of scrimmage. that season, we forced more turnovers than any team in the league. what the hell happened? that is the exact opposite of the defense we play now. who changed it fox or trogo?

#6 L.A. Fanatic

L.A. Fanatic

    LOWER YOUR FONT!!!!!!!!

  • Joined: 13-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 403
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:15 AM

the more we learn about this season the worse it looks

pretty impressive we went 12-4 considering it all now

#7 L.A. Fanatic

L.A. Fanatic

    LOWER YOUR FONT!!!!!!!!

  • Joined: 13-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 403
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:17 AM

i cant figure it out myself. in 2005, Our CBs played man coverage, and were very physical off the line of scrimmage. that season, we forced more turnovers than any team in the league. what the hell happened? that is the exact opposite of the defense we play now. who changed it fox or trogo?


i know they changed the rules some and that had an effect on it. i do miss the physical play of our CBs. we used to maul WRs back then, especially in 03

i dont think we will ever know who made the bonehead move to go away from this obviously very effective strategy

#8 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,710
  • Reputation: 16,139
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:22 AM

I know folks will gravitate to option B, but I don't think option A is all that farfetched either.

Think it over a little before you decide.

#9 L.A. Fanatic

L.A. Fanatic

    LOWER YOUR FONT!!!!!!!!

  • Joined: 13-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 403
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:29 AM

it might have been a mixture of both

#10 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,710
  • Reputation: 16,139
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:36 AM

Admittedly, in the end, I'd also choose B.

If your boss started spending a lot of time trying to "help" you do your job, how would you react?

#11 outlaw4

outlaw4

    Winning Cures Everything

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 972
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 02:40 AM

From Gantt: Future for Panthers coaches up in the air

About midway through the article...


Putting 2 and 2 together, John Fox began paying more attention to the defense around mid-season.

And when did the defense start to decline?

Around the latter part of mid-season :confused5:

Thus, you can take two possible conclusions from this.


A) Fox's input wasn't helpful. Perhaps it was just "too many cooks spoil the broth" or maybe their ideas just didn't mesh well. For whatever reason, it didn't help and may, in fact, have hurt.

or

B) Trgovac was annoyed, resentful, nervous or some other adverse emotion because Fox was sticking his nose in for the second year in a row. These bad feelings affected his job performance in the latter half of the year.


Which of these sounds more plausible?

I would say...

C) We have no idea and we never will.


I guess the "loyal to his assistants" argument won't work next season. :lol:

#12 countryboi

countryboi

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,514
  • Reputation: 400
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2009 - 08:24 AM

Admittedly, in the end, I'd also choose B.

If your boss started spending a lot of time trying to "help" you do your job, how would you react?


that seems to make alot of sense but maybe fox is just like that...some people like to have to there hands in everything....fox is a defensive coach after all