Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr. Scot

Interesting note on this year's defense

43 posts in this topic

What doesn't make sense to me if why would Fox get more involved if everything were going along fine. He gets involved when things are not going well not the other way around. And his fixes would be directed toward areas which need improvement which in the past have been largely successful. I would think that if his interventions weren't successful he would either back off or try something else. I haven't really seen an example of where his interventions made things worse rather than better. If not before then why now?

It makes more sense that our defense was worse as the season progressed due to the better competition we were facing. And he got involved as we started to struggle. On the other hand maybe he needs a new perspective or new approach. Our defense isn't as aggressive as it needs to be and without Peppers it will need a new scheme. If we don't it will be the worse one we have had under Fox. And after this year, that would take some doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What doesn't make sense to me if why would Fox get more involved if everything were going along fine. He gets involved when things are not going well not the other way around. And his fixes would be directed toward areas which need improvement which in the past have been largely successful. I would think that if his interventions weren't successful he would either back off or try something else. I haven't really seen an example of where his interventions made things worse rather than better. If not before then why now?

It makes more sense that our defense was worse as the season progressed due to the better competition we were facing. And he got involved as we started to struggle. On the other hand maybe he needs a new perspective or new approach. Our defense isn't as aggressive as it needs to be and without Peppers it will need a new scheme. If we don't it will be the worse one we have had under Fox. And after this year, that would take some doing.

Gantt didn't provide a specific time when he got involved other than "mid-season". It's logical to expect that it happened after something made him think there was a problem. What it was, or exactly when? Not known at this point, but you can make an educated guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we actually started the season with an elite defense. had the #2 secondary in the league. shut down every elite RB we played. shut down the #1 and #2 passing offenses.

then after the bye mid-season they collapsed. this article is making me rethink things a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we actually started the season with an elite defense. had the #2 secondary in the league. shut down every elite RB we played. shut down the #1 and #2 passing offenses.

then after the bye mid-season they collapsed. this article is making me rethink things a bit.

If our defense was doing so well then why would Fox intervene? He is not the problem and at worse was not able to fix it. But his intervention clearly wouldn't have been the problem or made things worse. Otherwise he would have just kept things as they were and kept going along as we were. Seems to me after the break we went to much more of a zone look after using more man coverages early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If our defense was doing so well then why would Fox intervene? He is not the problem and at worse was not able to fix it. But his intervention clearly wouldn't have been the problem or made things worse. Otherwise he would have just kept things as they were and kept going along as we were. Seems to me after the break we went to much more of a zone look after using more man coverages early.

Reminds me, there's word the Skins might be looking to trade Carlos Rogers.

He could conceivably be a decent complement to Gamble (if fully recovered from knee issues) and could be had more cheaply than Asomugha, but they may want a second rounder for him. I think that's a bit more than I'd want to give up, especially with no first rounder at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reminds me, there's word the Skins might be looking to trade Carlos Rogers.

He could conceivably be a decent complement to Gamble (if fully recovered from knee issues) and could be had more cheaply than Asomugha, but they may want a second rounder for him. I think that's a bit more than I'd want to give up, especially with no first rounder at the moment.

I would like to get another good man coverage corner whether in FA or through the draft. I figure that our current guys would be better in man coverage than zone plus we could use more depth in the case of injuries and in nickel and dime coverages.

I would like to get some bigger corners with the speed to cover as well as the size to fight for the ball. Our corners are generally not very big and physical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to get another good man coverage corner whether in FA or through the draft. I figure that our current guys would be better in man coverage than zone plus we could use more depth in the case of injuries and in nickel and dime coverages.

I would like to get some bigger corners with the speed to cover as well as the size to fight for the ball. Our corners are generally not very big and physical.

He's 6-0, 190. Started the year as their top guy but fell off some, sat out all last year (knee) and is a bit disgruntled now over being replaced with DeAngelo Hall.

I could see getting him, but a second rounder is too high a price.

My favorite trade idea this offseason is still getting Heath Miller from the Steelers.

Todd Heap is a tad disgruntled in Baltimore, but he'd likely cost too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might be overthinking it here.

Per Gantt, Fox started horning in on the defensive side of things about mid-season, which is right around the time we fell off. This was the second straight season Fox had gotten "more involved" in the defense.

The question is simply this: Do you believe we fell off because Fox's input messed things up or do you believe having Fox looking over his shoulder adversely affected Trgovac's ability to do the job?

Looking beyond the limits that you set is overthinking? I disagree. It seems that far too many here are willing to hang Trgovac and keep Fox. If we take mid season as meaning week 8, then Fox got involved, and the D dropped in performance. If it was later, then the D dropped, Fox got involved, but was unable to fix it. (And we really don't know that Trgo did not invite Fox's involvement to begin with.)

Why does Fox get the pass while some call for Trgo's head on a pike? Isn't it possible that Fox is more to blame for the ills than Trgo? Fox wore a headset, heard the calls, had the authority to make changes. He also reviewed and approved game plans for both the O and the D. Why bring in a different cook if the head chef is just going to order him to burn the beef stew?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking beyond the limits that you set is overthinking? I disagree. It seems that far too many here are willing to hang Trgovac and keep Fox. If we take mid season as meaning week 8, then Fox got involved, and the D dropped in performance. If it was later, then the D dropped, Fox got involved, but was unable to fix it. (And we really don't know that Trgo did not invite Fox's involvement to begin with.)

Why does Fox get the pass while some call for Trgo's head on a pike? Isn't it possible that Fox is more to blame for the ills than Trgo? Fox wore a headset, heard the calls, had the authority to make changes. He also reviewed and approved game plans for both the O and the D. Why bring in a different cook if the head chef is just going to order him to burn the beef stew?

Blaming Fox for screwing things up was one of the options I gave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps Fox and Trgovac had different ideas on what needed to be "fixed" and that caused some confusion in the defensive backfield. In the attempt to correct the fix they had the DL injuries. Then some people began overplaying and freelancing trying to help other players and it all fell apart. Remember early in the season when the defense was playing so well you kept hearing guys talking about everybody knows their resposibilities and as long as everyone is where they are supposed to be and nobody is trying to help cover other peoples areas and freelancing like in the past it will work. Evidently they stopped doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites