Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

VaginalWartPuss

Impeachobama.com

Recommended Posts





Htar    0

I, unlike the libs that couldn't get over it before Bush's term began, am willing to give him a shot.

I think if he begins to listen and follow Pelosi and Reid, he's done...I also think if we get hit by a terror attack in his first term he's done as well.

He gets a pass on the economy, no matter what. Nobody knows what to do about it or completely how we got to this point. I do not think bailing these companies and banks out is a good idea or will really work in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas    7,375

You are full of poo. People were down on Bush when he announced that Iraq was part of Al Queida. Before that he was good for a laugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JoCoLoco    6

The left had nothing but contempt for Bush from day 1. I've been hoping that conservatives rise above that nonsense since the election. I'm rooting for the guy, and my criticism of his performance, be it positive or negative, will be based on his decisions and the policies he enacts. It will not be based on the fact that I'm feeling sulky 'cause they didn't count the ballots for a fifth time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mmmbeans    443

I, unlike the libs that couldn't get over it before Bush's term began, am willing to give him a shot.

I think if he begins to listen and follow Pelosi and Reid, he's done...I also think if we get hit by a terror attack in his first term he's done as well.

He gets a pass on the economy, no matter what. Nobody knows what to do about it or completely how we got to this point. I do not think bailing these companies and banks out is a good idea or will really work in the end.

yea, i don't like snapple either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you imagine the stress on the guy already? He knows that if he screws up, that blows it for any and all minorities' chances in the future (at least in this lifetime).

I didn't vote for the man, but I'm willing to give him a chance and see where he takes us.

As the saying goes, "Only time will tell."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mmmbeans    443

Can you imagine the stress on the guy already? He knows that if he screws up, that blows it for any and all minorities' chances in the future (at least in this lifetime).

I didn't vote for the man, but I'm willing to give him a chance and see where he takes us.

As the saying goes, "Only time will tell."

you think that people who elected a minority for the first time in history would be dumb enough to think that "if he sucks than all minorities suck at presidenting, and I'll never vote for one again, no matter what?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas    7,375

The left had nothing but contempt for Bush from day 1. I've been hoping that conservatives rise above that nonsense since the election. I'm rooting for the guy, and my criticism of his performance, be it positive or negative, will be based on his decisions and the policies he enacts. It will not be based on the fact that I'm feeling sulky 'cause they didn't count the ballots for a fifth time.

People on the left thought he was stupid. Because as far as having the intelligence to run a country, he is. Thats a lot different from "having it in for him". If that was the case, the outcry against him would have been strong when he wanted to go into Afganistan. Of course, you may be referring to the far left whackos, in which case I can tell you about 3 people I know who have referred to Tuesday as "Assassination Day".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II    4,209

Can you imagine the stress on the guy already? He knows that if he screws up, that blows it for any and all minorities' chances in the future (at least in this lifetime).

I didn't vote for the man, but I'm willing to give him a chance and see where he takes us.

As the saying goes, "Only time will tell."

I don't agree. Regardless of how good or bad Obama does, the demographics of the nation are changing and the chances for minorities will continue to improve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II    4,209

People on the left thought he was stupid. Because as far as having the intelligence to run a country, he is. Thats a lot different from "having it in for him". If that was the case, the outcry against him would have been strong when he wanted to go into Afganistan. Of course, you may be referring to the far left whackos, in which case I can tell you about 3 people I know who have referred to Tuesday as "Assassination Day".

I don't like Bush, but I think its a mistake to say that he is stupid. He is definitely not on those on the left were seriously mistaken to think so. Thats probably why they lost the election in 04. I do think that his style of decision making and leadership is wrong for being president, but that doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of intelligence.

In truth, I think that GWB's problem was laziness. He didn't want to put in the time to study the issues, he wanted his subordinates to do that. That style of leadership works when you have competent subordinates, but Bush relied to much on Rumsfeld and Cheney. Notice how things in the DOD and Iraq improved when Rummy was removed and Gates came in. Gates is a competent advisor and administrator, so things improved. In the beginning, prior to 9-11, I think there was a certain amount of balance in the Whitehouse between Cheney and Rummy on one side and more competent, moderate advisors such as Powell and Rice on the other. But 9-11 tilted the balance towards the hardliners, and this led to a lot of mistakes on the part of the administration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Matt Foley    1

I don't like Bush, but I think its a mistake to say that he is stupid. He is definitely not on those on the left were seriously mistaken to think so. Thats probably why they lost the election in 04. I do think that his style of decision making and leadership is wrong for being president, but that doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of intelligence.

In truth, I think that GWB's problem was laziness. He didn't want to put in the time to study the issues, he wanted his subordinates to do that. That style of leadership works when you have competent subordinates, but Bush relied to much on Rumsfeld and Cheney. Notice how things in the DOD and Iraq improved when Rummy was removed and Gates came in. Gates is a competent advisor and administrator, so things improved. In the beginning, prior to 9-11, I think there was a certain amount of balance in the Whitehouse between Cheney and Rummy on one side and more competent, moderate advisors such as Powell and Rice on the other. But 9-11 tilted the balance towards the hardliners, and this led to a lot of mistakes on the part of the administration.

Excellent analysis. On top of all that, Obama sucks big donkey balls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×