If we sign a FA WR
#2
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:46 AM
#3
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:46 AM
it depends on if they weren't planning on him being a factor until next year anyway.and AE is not activated will you consider his selection a complete failure? With Mike Williams and Geno Atkins on the board when we traded up I certainly would.
i don't think you can really judge players, esp. WRs and QBs, on their rookie year.
#4
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:47 AM
Edwards wasn't drafted to be starting WR in 2010.
#5
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:52 AM
#7
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:57 AM
it takes most WRs a few years to be NFL ready.
Edwards wasn't drafted to be starting WR in 2010.
but with what we gave up he was expected to contribute
you dont give up a 2nd rounder for a player that you expect to deactivate most of the season
there are plenty of WRs who were drafted after him who are getting plenty of clock, yet AE hasnt seen a snap yet. nobody expects him to be a starter but with what we gave up, we expect him to be out there making catches
#8
Posted 05 October 2010 - 09:59 AM
#10
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:01 AM
#11
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:01 AM
The real question is, did we really need another "Panthro hates on AE" thread?
#13
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:03 AM
...coulda got Gilyard too...
#14
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:03 AM
Considering the pick isn't technically used until next year, I believe you have to at least give it until the end of said year to make a judgement.
The real question is, did we really need another "Panthro hates on AE" thread?
We have 2 Wide Receivers out. If we don't activate him and he sees the field then he was a garbage selection and the FO now believes it too.
Name a WR we have selected under Fox that panned out?
#15
Posted 05 October 2010 - 10:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





