Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Tea Party


  • Please log in to reply
124 replies to this topic

#1 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,560 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 07:46 PM

http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/002765/

Thank you, Christine.

As ignorant as your followers.

#2 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,831 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:00 PM

:rofl:

#3 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,831 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:05 PM

She's just clueless. She really thought she had him nailed to the wall on a mistake and she fuged up.

#4 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,482 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:13 PM

the irony is every single person who has ever attended a tea party has gone on record and said the same thing. amazing

#5 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:24 PM

the irony is every single person who has ever attended a tea party has gone on record and said the same thing. amazing


"Hey, we're not the idiots here! It's the people we're voting for!"

#6 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,923 posts
  • LocationPleiades

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:25 PM

really?? where in the constitution is the sepeartion of church and state???

#7 ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

    Insane Racist Moron

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,492 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:30 PM

Well then, allow me to go on record as saying that nowhere in the constitution or any ammendment does the phrase "seperation of church and state" appear. Now, it does say that congress shall not make any law about religion, either positively or negatively, but that's about it. Not really sure how one would seperate a right from the government established to protect rights, but hey, what do I know?

Damn Thomas Jefferson.

All that said, she really poo the bed on that one. Need a better grasp of your debate skills if you're going to go against 142 years of flawed interpretation.

#8 Matt Moore

Matt Moore

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:37 PM

lol at teabaggers acting like this wasn't a failed gotcha attempt

#9 Matt Moore

Matt Moore

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:41 PM

the real gotcha was when he said "government shall make no law establishing a religion"

and she says "that's in the first amendment?"

wtg

#10 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,482 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:42 PM

so now everybody is for the constitution again. hilarious

#11 ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

    Insane Racist Moron

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,492 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:45 PM

so now everybody is for the constitution again. hilarious


As long as its a "seperation of church and state", not a "freedom of religion".

I'm all for a seperation of speech and state. Congress just needs to shut the hell up.

#12 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,560 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:46 PM

We've always been for the constitution. We've just never been so dumb as to think there was one simple silver bullet interpretation that the weak minded tend to fall for.

#13 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,482 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:46 PM

i totally agree

#14 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,560 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 08:48 PM

Well then, allow me to go on record as saying that nowhere in the constitution or any ammendment does the phrase "seperation of church and state" appear. Now, it does say that congress shall not make any law about religion, either positively or negatively, but that's about it. Not really sure how one would seperate a right from the government established to protect rights, but hey, what do I know?

Damn Thomas Jefferson.

All that said, she really poo the bed on that one. Need a better grasp of your debate skills if you're going to go against 142 years of flawed interpretation.


I'm aware of what the 1st amendment says. I actually watched the video.

#15 ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

    Insane Racist Moron

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,492 posts

Posted 19 October 2010 - 09:00 PM

I'm aware of what the 1st amendment says. I actually watched the video.


So did I. He says "seperation of church and state", she says "where is that?", he says "first amendment", she says "thats in the first amendment? where?", he says "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion", she says "where is that", yadda yadda yadda.

Later in the debate, he can't name the five freedoms of the 1st amendment. So what your saying is that you know more about the first than Coons does. All I'm saying is you have a better comprehension of debate skills than O'Donnell.

Dude, you should move to Delaware and run for senate.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com