Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cracka McNasty

I want Andrew Luck

37 posts in this topic

Bills will have the #1 pick and take him, Hurney is still here and won't take a QB with his first pick in consecutive years, Patrick Peterson is the BPA of the draft, a need, and the best CB prospect to come out since Darrelle Revis.

But yeah, besides that we should totally get Luck.

i see what you're saying, we will have a bigger need at CB and possibly DL, I understand that, I just reaaaaaaally want Luck badly...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am inclined to agree with you Cracka McNasty,so what,in your opinion,does Luck bring to the Game that Clausen doesn't and how would you rate his upside compared to Clausen.

The reason i ask these questions is i know very little about Luck and have never seen him play,just heard others talk about him. Thanks

kid has great poise, he just looks like a leader (might not actually be one, but if he isn't, he's a great actor). Great Size 6-4", above average arm, and mobile. He's inexperienced but he really just seems to have a tremendous upside. He just seems to have that "it" factor. I didn't see it in Clausen and I don't see it in Jake Locker.

then again, i am not a professional scout nor do i claim to be. Just my opinion of the kid.

more on him here:

http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2010/05/andrew-luck-scouting-report.html

http://draftace.com/blog/2010/05/12/a-early-scouting-report-on-andrew-luck/

http://nflmocks.com/2010/06/30/2011-nfl-draft-scouting-report-andrew-luck-stanford/

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=8&c=1&nid=2741838

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i want him and his HC.

if we can draft him, we need to.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I want him. So far, he is making his mark against some pretty bad defenses.

If, (and its a big if) we draft another QB, I would prefer someone from one of the more talented conferences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

kid has great poise, he just looks like a leader (might not actually be one, but if he isn't, he's a great actor). Great Size 6-4", above average arm, and mobile. He's inexperienced but he really just seems to have a tremendous upside. He just seems to have that "it" factor. I didn't see it in Clausen and I don't see it in Jake Locker.

then again, i am not a professional scout nor do i claim to be. Just my opinion of the kid.

more on him here:

http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2010/05/andrew-luck-scouting-report.html

http://draftace.com/blog/2010/05/12/a-early-scouting-report-on-andrew-luck/

http://nflmocks.com/2010/06/30/2011-nfl-draft-scouting-report-andrew-luck-stanford/

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=8&c=1&nid=2741838

Thanks for the links about Andrew Luck.He certainly seems like the real deal and i liked his poise,size and arm strength.

It will be interesting to see how he is rated close to the 2011 NFL draft date.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hurney is our GM, and will be next season. He will not select a QB. not not not not not. not infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd still get drafted and get a huge contract if you're a top draft pick. Why risk tens of millions of dollars to stay in college one more year?

I don't think you would get a huge contract.

If there was no football, teams will NOT be inclined to sign the players to big contracts. There would be dozens of unsigned draft picks 6 and 9 months after the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need help in other areas besides QB and the chance of this guy coming in and lighting it up first year is slim. We need offensive help, WR, Oline. I would not be pissed if we got a defensive stud either. Wait a year and see if Clausen can get into his own, then if not make a move for a QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More talented conference than the PAC10? Maybe some more defensive teams but certainly they are among the most talented conferences in the country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More talented conference than the PAC10? Maybe some more defensive teams but certainly they are among the most talented conferences in the country.

Nobody in the Pac-10 seems 2 play defense like the Sec so QB in that conferance put up ridculous #. Mallet might not be a better QB then Luck but you know week after week he's played against talented defenders week after week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites