Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

AJ

9 posts in this topic

Posted

After today's game, can anyone really argue against going for AJ Green if he's there? Our passing game is OBVIOUSLY our weakest link. I could care less about how many receivers we drafted this past year. We could have a great defense if our interior linemen were better, yes, but they're serviceable for now. Our passing game is NOT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There's always the argument to go BPA rather than need and I don't believe Green is the top prospect, although he's up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I just wish there were a Suh-like DT, but guys like him come around once a decade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

After today's game, can anyone really argue against going for AJ Green if he's there? Our passing game is OBVIOUSLY our weakest link. I could care less about how many receivers we drafted this past year. We could have a great defense if our interior linemen were better, yes, but they're serviceable for now. Our passing game is NOT.

You could make a case that one of the last things we need is another young WR.

We just drafted 3 WR and they need time to adjust to the pro game and that takes time but if we are picking top 3 we have to go BPA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I like the whole BPA route in most cases, however, I believe he should be a SLIGHT exception. As in, if he is not quite the best player on the board, but if he's right up there with Player X, and Player X isn't relevant to our priorities, I say we shouldn't even hesitate to grab him...but then again, thats why Jerry pays people Hurney a boatload of money, so I'm sure *knock on wood* whatever decision is made, it will work out for us.

I just know, as a Gamecock fan, I've seen this kid tear up some very solid SEC secondary's. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can't think of any position that would be out of our priorities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I like the whole BPA route in most cases, however, I believe he should be a SLIGHT exception. As in, if he is not quite the best player on the board, but if he's right up there with Player X, and Player X isn't relevant to our priorities, I say we shouldn't even hesitate to grab him...but then again, thats why Jerry pays people Hurney a boatload of money, so I'm sure *knock on wood* whatever decision is made, it will work out for us.

I just know, as a Gamecock fan, I've seen this kid tear up some very solid SEC secondary's. lol

True..but think of the log jam we could have if the current group of WR plus AJ green turn into something...

If he is there then I think you take him for BPA but we still jave Armanti thats like a 2nd round pick on a WR:nonod: a CB at #2 overall would seem like a reach and there are no suh like DT in this class..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm torn between AJ Green, Patrick Peterson, or trading down in the first round to grab someone like Amukamara and getting our 2nd back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm torn between AJ Green, Patrick Peterson, or trading down in the first round to grab someone like Amukamara and getting our 2nd back.

this. I have faith that gettis, lafell, and either armanti, or devin thomas/ clowney will pan out for us. I want peterson, especially since marshall will most likely be gone. I want another playmaker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites