Catdaddy 0 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 Moore is second in int's in the League and he has only started four games. If he had started all 7 games for us, he would be leading by a very good margin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Saltman 1,398 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 I thought u were going to talk about something interesting like who our number 2 receiver is. Not another stupid fuging Moore thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA 7,867 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 I really think they should make Gettis the full time #2 and just use LaFell in 3 WR sets. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jhyler12 29 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 Moore is second in int's in the League and he has only started four games. If he had started all 7 games for us, he would be leading by a very good margin. Sound like Delhomme numbers... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pox 08 2,186 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 Or would he. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jhyler12 29 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 I really think they should make Gettis the full time #2 and just use LaFell in 3 WR sets. Agreed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA 7,867 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 It's not like Gettis is a horrible run blocker. LaFell is obviously better but really, we need some playmakers out there. Giving the starting spot to La-Fell-down-on-that-route just because he blocks better is f**king retarded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dpantherman 558 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 yep, #2 fits this quite perfectly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carl Spackler 3,821 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 He's apparently #1 in the League in interceptions that aren't his fault. I just want him to stop throwing stupid passes and read blitzes better. Sack-fumbles aren't really his fault nor were they Clausen's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Saltman 1,398 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 It's not like Gettis is a horrible run blocker. LaFell is obviously better but really, we need some playmakers out there. Giving the starting spot to La-Fell-down-on-that-route just because he blocks better is f**king retarded. I know, ***. What they should do is stop running the ball all together. It's not like it is fooling anyone. What they should do is keep a tight end to block, have gettis, Lafell and smith, with goodson as the 4th reciever and keep it a short passing game. It's not like it could be any worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2jakefansinva 1,982 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 I know, ***. What they should do is stop running the ball all together. It's not like it is fooling anyone. What they should do is keep a tight end to block, have gettis, Lafell and smith, with goodson as the 4th reciever and keep it a short passing game. It's not like it could be any worse. a man after my own heart........ and it wouldn't really matter to me if we won or not......I'd be excited just because.... WE DID SOMETHING F*CKING DIFFERENT. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Saltman 1,398 Report post Posted November 1, 2010 int's will be there regardless. Why the *** not?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
