Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The Panthers STILL need WR help.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
60 replies to this topic

#31 King Taharqa

King Taharqa

    The Panthers Quarterback

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,774 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:17 AM

We dont need anymore WRs til we upgrade the QB position. You dont buy fancy rims for a car with a bad engine.

#32 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 41,451 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:22 AM

i still thinks hackett needs to stay..it takes too long to bring rookie WR along and moose has 1-2 to years to play

After I watched Hackett in training camp, I told a friend "if he can stay healthy, we've found something here."

He didn't :(

I'd agree with at least taking him to camp, but I acknowledge he could be another "Dan Morgan" type.

#33 scpanther22

scpanther22

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,221 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:34 AM

After I watched Hackett in training camp, I told a friend "if he can stay healthy, we've found something here."

He didn't :(

I'd agree with at least taking him to camp, but I acknowledge he could be another "Dan Morgan" type.


how many games was he hurt total..i think it was only 4.and i think we had him on special teams at the time too. why do you put a injury prone player on special teams

#34 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,063 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:36 AM

We dont need anymore WRs til we upgrade the QB position. You dont buy fancy rims for a car with a bad engine.


when was the last time you went to the underground.

#35 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 41,451 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:41 AM

how many games was he hurt total..i think it was only 4.and i think we had him on special teams at the time too. why do you put a injury prone player on special teams

I don't think it's so much "injured" with him this past season as it was just "not full strength". That's one reason why I think (hope) next year could make a difference.

And like I said before, get a legit receiving threat who can also block as a starting TE and I'm happy with this receiving corps.

(I'd love a trade to acquire Heath Miller)

#36 mantal

mantal

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,344 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 11:45 AM

"runs to start new topic on same subject"


Add more receivers? Stupid! We're running out of our ears with receivers. If we do not address obvious needs, DL to say the least, then we can't expect a winning season next year or the year after...

#37 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,819 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 12:26 PM

"runs to start new topic on same subject"


Add more receivers? Stupid! We're running out of our ears with receivers. If we do not address obvious needs, DL to say the least, then we can't expect a winning season next year or the year after...


I think we need another QB too. :lol:

#38 Ncstatefan

Ncstatefan

    GO PACK!!!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 654 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 12:43 PM

Jarrett will be the #2 and with the new QB coach, jake will actually pass it too him

#39 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 41,451 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 12:55 PM

Jarrett will be the #2 and with the new QB coach, jake will actually pass it too him

I'm not convinced Jarrett is going to earn Jake's trust. He'll need to, and he might, but I don't think it's a lock by any stretch.

(at this point, it's iffy whether he's earned it from Fox or Davidson)

#40 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,546 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 01:55 PM

"runs to start new topic on same subject"


Add more receivers? Stupid! We're running out of our ears with receivers. If we do not address obvious needs, DL to say the least, then we can't expect a winning season next year or the year after...


Not saying add per se. Need to find one that is dependable both with catching the ball and actually being in the game.

#41 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,546 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 01:56 PM

when was the last time you went to the underground.


:yesnod: :auto:

#42 Jerkyboy

Jerkyboy

    Member

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:33 PM

I say give Hackett one more year to also learn our system and stay healthy, I like him and Jarret, but if Hackett doesn't work out I also think Jarret will be a steady #2, and I only mean steady, not good


I agree, I was really hyped to get him last year and I do think he will be good here as well as Jarrett and Moose still has a few years to contribute as well. I am surprised there hasn't been any Holt talk lately, he's probably gonna get cut or traded. I know he's getting old and I'm not even sure I would want him unless it was cheap but I see him playing forever like Rice. I am not too worried about our receiving game cause we have the best rb tandem in the nfl so we don't have to have 3 #1 receivers.

#43 SKULL

SKULL

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 328 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 03:17 PM

Stand pat

Work both Hackett & Jarrett in more

And for 3 WR's sets

Line up Stewart & Williams in backfield with one splitting out to WR

With both on field at same times would create Defensive problems

#44 Fox007

Fox007

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,136 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 03:20 PM

Stand pat

Work both Hackett & Jarrett in more

And for 3 WR's sets

Line up Stewart & Williams in backfield with one splitting out to WR

With both on field at same times would create Defensive problems




If we could actually execute screen plays to any kind of success man that would make my day, and make it a really bad thing for defenses.

I just get the feeling that defenses know that poo isn't going to certain places. Like they don't have to play honest in most situations, because of our tendency to not do certain things.

#45 Spike

Spike

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 278 posts

Posted 25 January 2009 - 03:23 PM

Draft Tate, Harvin, and Hartwell.


Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com