Jump to content


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


WikiLeaks a terrorist group?

Recommended Posts

read up on the dangers of Fluoride... and Flo Rida

There's a reason dentists tell you not to swallow that sh!t, right Epistaxis? LOL

But we're supposed to believe the govt. gives a damn about our teeth despite the fact that fluoride doesn't "hang out" in your mouth, it goes elsewhere immediately. you don't have to go to "conspiracy theory" websites to find recent articles about the doubts of fluoride in our water systems. The EPA doesn't even allow corporations to dump the amount of fluoride in the environment that we get in tap water.

Some cities are now finding that there fluoride is coming from China and has some sort of white "undissolved powder" that stays in the filter once the fluoride has been added to their water systems.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many terrorist organizations today have their roots in something our "intelligence" services started? No conspiracy theory BS, just think on it.

How many wars have we won that were brought about by our "intelligence" community? Vietnam? Nope. Iraq II? Pyrrhic victory at best... so far. Afghanistan? Not looking like it.

Cold War? Not started by our intelligence community, it was the epilogue to WWII, which was the second chapter of WWI.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

wikileaks is playing a dangerous game. posting the information AND SOURCES is extremely careless. that's a good way to increase tensions between nations and get individuals killed.

whoever is giving the information to them should be tried for espionage.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

irony: the same people attacking wikileaks are largely the same people who say "if you're not doing anything wrong, why do you care?" when the government invades our privacy.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole play-by-play the police are doing with the media gives me a feeling that this is contrived or staged. Still...

This could change my mind.

WikiLeaks’ Plan To Take Down A Major Bank

Posted by majestic on November 30, 2010

Julian Assange, perhaps THE man of the media moment, says that early in 2011 WikiLeaks will disclose documents so damning that their release could “take down a bank or two.” Finally perhaps, some retribution for the Plunder of America by the banksters? From Andy Greenberg’s interview with Assange for Forbes:

Forbes: Is it a U.S. bank?

Assange: Yes, it’s a U.S. bank.

One that still exists?

Yes, a big U.S. bank.

The biggest U.S. bank?

No comment.

When will it happen?

Early next year. I won’t say more.

What do you want to be the result of this release?

[Pauses] I’m not sure.

It will give a true and representative insight into how banks behave at the executive level in a way that will stimulate investigations and reforms, I presume.

Usually when you get leaks at this level, it’s about one particular case or one particular violation. For this, there’s only one similar example. It’s like the Enron emails. Why were these so valuable? When Enron collapsed, through court processes, thousands and thousands of emails came out that were internal, and it provided a window into how the whole company was managed. It was all the little decisions that supported the flagrant violations.

This will be like that. Yes, there will be some flagrant violations, unethical practices that will be revealed, but it will also be all the supporting decision-making structures and the internal executive ethos that cames out, and that’s tremendously valuable. Like the Iraq War Logs, yes there were mass casualty incidents that were very newsworthy, but the great value is seeing the full spectrum of the war.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites