Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

WikiLeaks a terrorist group?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
74 replies to this topic

#25 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,507
  • Reputation: 3,471
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 November 2010 - 07:42 PM

Interpol is after him for rape.

Seems like an inordinate amount of international effort for a guy who banged some sluts

#26 blackcatgrowl

blackcatgrowl

    Trolls live here

  • Joined: 06-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,944
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 30 November 2010 - 08:02 PM

Interpol is after him for rape.

Seems like an inordinate amount of international effort for a guy who banged some sluts


Heh. Lets see....

He released documents that incriminate not just the U.S., but multiple foreign governments, including China, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Russia, on conspiring to create environments of regime change and exposing internal incompetence.

That pretty much makes him the #1 wanted man in the world. He's taken a poo on all the big players. They're gonna find a way, any way, to make him suffer.

#27 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,922
  • Reputation: 1,344
HUDDLER

Posted 30 November 2010 - 08:34 PM

Interpol is after him for rape.

Seems like an inordinate amount of international effort for a guy who banged some sluts



Yea thats a funny story. He was cleared of all charges by that country but under US pressure they reopened the case. Now he is wanted by interpol. Funny how if you expose the US on its bullshit your the terrorist but TSA terrorizes people everyday and its all in the good of the people.

#28 ChucktownK

ChucktownK

    Gitmo Nation Detainee

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,043
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 12:44 AM

Sure. As long as someone gets a sharpie and marks out names first.


I thought that at 1st too but there has not been 1 instance of blowback since they were released months ago. So they say.

#29 ChucktownK

ChucktownK

    Gitmo Nation Detainee

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,043
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 02:50 AM

Yea thats a funny story. He was cleared of all charges by that country but under US pressure they reopened the case. Now he is wanted by interpol. Funny how if you expose the US on its bullpoo your the terrorist but TSA terrorizes people everyday and its all in the good of the people.


Really doesn't matter since, constitutionally, our Gov. can only prosecute the person who actually leaked the docs, not the publisher which Assange is.

Too bad NeoCons!!!

Sorry Buck Private Manning, even though there's no possible way you were the only one acquiring the docs, you're gonna pay for exposing our govt for what it is.

#30 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,125
  • Reputation: 1,527
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:15 AM

Fwiw, I don't think we should go after the wikileaks guy. If the Swede's have something against him, then so be it. But we should not.

However, whomever gave him the information should do 20 years hard time in Leavenworth.

#31 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,407
  • Reputation: 1
Banned

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:30 AM

There shouldn't be any information to give in the first place...

Our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people, and for the people... If that were the case, there should be no secrets...

Get out of the business of being world police and focus on the people's needs that you supposedly serve...

#32 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,814
  • Reputation: 3,102
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:38 AM

so i guess some users are going to put their passwords in threads now?

#33 CLTPanther

CLTPanther

    This Space for Rent

  • Joined: 12-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,953
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:38 AM

There should be no secrets? Most people either can't handle the truth or are too stupid to even care, so why tell the public every single thing that could cause panic? I'm not saying they should be starting covert wars, but to say there should be no secrets is naive.

#34 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,125
  • Reputation: 1,527
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:39 AM

There shouldn't be any information to give in the first place...

Our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people, and for the people... If that were the case, there should be no secrets...

Get out of the business of being world police and focus on the people's needs that you supposedly serve...


Thats incredibly naive. Glad you are not in charge of anything.

#35 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,407
  • Reputation: 1
Banned

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:40 AM

so i guess some users are going to put their passwords in threads now?


I don't work for the government and serve the people...

#36 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,814
  • Reputation: 3,102
HUDDLER

Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:40 AM

but you have reasons to protect your info no?