Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Insight into the "earmark ban"

19 posts in this topic

Posted

I wonder how much the elaborate oversight system will cost? probably a lot more than the most cost efficient one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I guess you guys can't give Obama 6 months to change a system decades in the making?

Next two paragraphs.

But none of that will happen until after the bill becomes law. Even critics of the earmarks system acknowledge that specifying projects upfront offers some measure of transparency.

"We hate earmarks, but at least it's a way of tracking where influence is had," said Keith Ashdown of the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. "There is a challenge now that projects will be added behind closed doors without a paper trail."

Point being that while he campaigned on transparency, he's putting a system in place that will actually make it tougher to track these things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Next two paragraphs.

Point being that while he campaigned on transparency, he's putting a system in place that will actually make it tougher to track these things.

Because that is the intended outcome or because lobbyists will always find a loophole in something that has to be thrown together in a week?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Because that is the intended outcome or because lobbyists will always find a loophole in something that has to be thrown together in a week?

Because he said whatever he thought would get him elected. Just like he went to Reverend Wright's sermon every Sunday when it helped him get elected in Chicago, then claimed he knew nothing about the man's true feelings when he wanted to win the national election.

Fluffo is a fraud. And you, sir, have been taken in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

you smoke to much seaweed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

you smoke to much seaweed

I don't inhale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Because he said whatever he thought would get him elected. Just like he went to Reverend Wright's sermon every Sunday when it helped him get elected in Chicago, then claimed he knew nothing about the man's true feelings when he wanted to win the national election.

Fluffo is a fraud. And you, sir, have been taken in.

Typical......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites