Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Current 1st round draft postions


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
28 replies to this topic

#21 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,392
  • Reputation: 4,556
HUDDLER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 12:36 AM

If we took Flacco a couple years ago instead of the FO hanging all their hopes on Jake, we could've had the luxury of trading down next year.

#22 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,352
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 01:09 AM

if Clausen somehow lights it up in his remaining games, then we can talk about a trade. right now... that seems unlikely.

You'd be surprised how many coaches think to themselves "Sure, that guy sucked before, but with me coaching him..."

The ego of a professional head coach is rarely a small thing.

#23 Beaston52

Beaston52

    Member

  • Joined: 23-August 10
  • posts: 75
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 11 December 2010 - 02:22 PM

If we took Flacco a couple years ago instead of the FO hanging all their hopes on Jake, we could've had the luxury of trading down next year.


If we had taken flacco we wouldn't be 1-11

#24 Seamonk

Seamonk

    kekekekekeke

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,058
  • Reputation: 29
HUDDLER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 02:44 PM

I just wish we can develop QBs for once. Haven't had a real stat machine at QB since Beuerlein.


edit: Also oh shi-.. looking back. When we let Beuerlein go (Let Jake go) and tried to stick with young QB Talent in Weinke and that other guy (Clausen and Incumbent Moore), we ended up going 1-15.

Edited by Seamonk, 11 December 2010 - 02:54 PM.


#25 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,392
  • Reputation: 4,556
HUDDLER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 05:04 PM

If we had taken flacco we wouldn't be 1-11


We'd still have a couple more wins, not much. But we would still be able to trade down in the 1st for more picks.

#26 jramsey4

jramsey4

    "Blisters on me Fingers"

  • Joined: 07-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,479
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 06:35 PM

So your saying you would trade Luck for Flacco basically? No just no. I like Flacco (I was wanting him over Stewart) and all but sorry Luck is a much much better prospect then Flacco was (notice how I said prospect no guarantees with the draft picks).

Edited by jramsey4, 11 December 2010 - 06:39 PM.


#27 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,392
  • Reputation: 4,556
HUDDLER

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:47 PM

We'd already have an established QB and most likely wouldn't be in the Luck running but would still have a top 1st rounder to trade down with.

#28 Cavscout

Cavscout

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,498
  • Reputation: 19
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2010 - 07:27 AM

Arizona's next four games are vs teams in the top ten of the draft order...Denver this weekend, Carolina next weekend, San Francisco and Dallas

1 Carolina 1-11 vs Atlanta :boxing_smiley:
2 Detroit 2-10 vs Green Bay :eek:
3 Cincinnati 2-10 at Pittsburgh :eek:
4 Buffalo 2-10 vs Cleveland :cool:
5 Arizona 3-9 vs Denver :rolleyes:
6 Denver 3-9 at Arizona :rolleyes:

#29 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
HUDDLER

Posted 12 December 2010 - 10:49 AM

Getting the #1 pick in the draft is almost as exciting as winning the super bowl for me.. because I feel Luck could get us multiple Super Bowls. I think he will be a Great QB.