Proudiddy went from saying
I had no idea who this clown (Chansky) was...
to calling him "a nobody", "an unathletic wannabe", " an arrogant, sweater vest wearing, out of touch yuppy", "a leech", "a pimp", a "glorified fan boy", "a fake" with "an inflated ego" and the list goes on.
But he didn't even know who "the clown" was?
Proudiddy also said "you think Chansky was in a position to make such a suggestion to the chancellor?”
If he didn’t know who Chansky was, he most definitely has no idea about the relationship between Chansky and the Chancellor.
It also sounds like he doesn’t know that the Chancellor invites the opinions of others. And that’s because, unlike many of us on this board, he knows that he doesn't know everything. He wants and needs input from others. And is willing to listen to it.
Proudiddy says, “I haven't looked through all the leaked emails and such that were on the news, but I haven't heard Woody Durham chiming in on what the chancellor should do... It's not his position. I respect Woody..."
I have read through a number of the emails that were given (not leaked) to the press. Hard to know who they are from because most of the names are hidden. One of them could very well be from Woody Durham. We just don't know.
What we do know is that they were from people willing to step up and speak their mind to the Chancellor in an effort to make a difference.
Weyco2000 said “sending an email is a cowards approach to speak their mind”
Seems to me we are the cowards - vigorously speaking our minds, sharing uninformed opinions, making rash judgments and being disrespectful to each other while hiding behind stupid screen names.
How brave we are! What a difference we will make in this world.
Edited by umhello, 11 January 2011 - 11:17 AM.