So tell me, which conferences are good? And you cant judge the conference from the players I mentioned when they played in it, based off of this year, like everyone is doing.
And I've named more then just players from the ACC and PAC 10, why didn't you address that?
Regardless, by listing all those players and their respective teams you didn't do them any justice either since the whole argument was strength of schedule and whatever conference they're in takes a huge part in their strength of schedule. in the SEC you see a lot of winning records, they win their nonconference games typically, whereas the ACC doesn't.
Their strength distributions also matter
the Pac-10, Big 10 and Big East are all top heavy. Once they've beaten the other 1 or 2 good teams, they're set for the year. there's also the lack of a championship game. You might not be seeing Oregon in the BCS Title if they had to play Stanford again.
the SEC and ACC and Big 12 have better distributions however the magnitude of the distributions aren't the same. It's tougher to win in these conferences. Could be an upset any week.
While the schedules and strengths of individual schools may not be the same year in and year out, the trends in the conferences are.
Actually i forgot what your point was compared to my point a while ago.. and i'm on too crappy of internet to open another tab and find out.. so i'm gonna just post this and hope it goes along with what i was supposed to be thinking.. for some reason i think i was just pointing out that the other guy was saying that the pac10 and acc are weak because he listed qbs from those conferences there and you brought up players from the same conferences saying they're strong so it's like, you can't really argue opinion using opinion.