Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

forget sexy, Obama is bringing science back


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
57 replies to this topic

#31 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:16 AM

Stem Cell research may be a big dead end...Chasing energy alternatives may be as well, but I suppose as long as the dems get to waste a bunch of money trying, it's OK!


you literally have the worst opinions about everything

#32 Scrumtrilescent

Scrumtrilescent

    I aim to misbehave.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 8,755
  • Reputation: 2,787
Administrators

Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:17 AM

DOn't touch meh stemz cellz!!!!

Gimme some of your skin cells, I can work backwards.

#33 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,983
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:18 AM

Daily baths? I didn't get the memo on that!


Then why do you frequent turkish bathhouses?

#34 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,407
  • Reputation: 2,343
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:36 AM

Because there are Turks, of course.

#35 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,817
  • Reputation: 4,796
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:53 AM

i didn't mention this because i didn't want to seem confrontational, but it has been eating at me for days.

please don't EVER tell me to forget sexy.

#36 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,114
  • Reputation: 183
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:46 PM

did you know that the term stem cells doesn't just refer to embryonic stem cells?


Yes ... the Web site I linked is the National Institutes of Health, and if you will do your research, you will know that none of these diseases have been cured by stem cells -- adult or embryonic.

Edited by Panthers_Lover, 03 February 2009 - 12:49 PM.


#37 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,929
  • Reputation: 1,459
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 05:45 PM

why do you keep posting this and not mentioning that it was all tied to those countries teaching abstinence only education, which almost certainly increased the rate of HIV infection?

not yet and that's probably not where their primary application will lie. (it doesn't make sense, for example, to treat rapidly reproducing cells with...more cells?) however, they're already using them to grow peoples' jaws back and human cells were used in rats to repair spinal chord damage in rats so it's difficult to say this is anything but the most promising and exciting breakthrough in medicine since, oh, I don't know, daily baths.



I only posted it once.

Edited by Davidson Deac II, 03 February 2009 - 05:51 PM.


#38 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 07:27 PM

I only posted it once.


oh sorry last time you used different articles

#39 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,817
  • Reputation: 4,796
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 07:33 PM

Yes ... the Web site I linked is the National Institutes of Health, and if you will do your research, you will know that none of these diseases have been cured by stem cells -- adult or embryonic.


you're wrong.

http://www.lifesiten...b/08021209.html

#40 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,929
  • Reputation: 1,459
HUDDLER

Posted 03 February 2009 - 09:34 PM

Not sure where you got your information from, but its seems to be incorrect for the most part. There is nothing wrong with teaching abstinence as long as it is not the only thing taught. It is the best and easiest way to avoid std's. Of course, that is not the only prevention method they teach, and only a small part of the budget is spent on teaching abstinence.

If you want to criticise GWB, be my guest. He certainly deserves a lot of criticism for a lot of things, but funding for medical research is not one of them.

US funding for Aids research and other disease went to virtually every country in the African continent and many other nations throughout the world. The primary recipients were 15 core nations, that included South Africa, Vietnam, Mozambique Tanzania among others.

PEPFAR has fielded domestic criticism from some Democrats and international activists for spending a portion of funding on abstinence-until-marriage programs and for placing conditions on other funds. Some political conservatives have criticized the program for what they consider the general inefficacy of foreign aid




Prefar (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief)

To slow the spread of the epidemic, PEPFAR supports a variety of prevention programs: the ABC approach (Abstain, Be faithful, and correct and consistent use of Condoms); prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) interventions; and programs focusing on blood safety, injection safety, secondary prevention ("prevention with positives"), counseling and education.

Initially, a recommended 20% of the PEPFAR budget was to be spent on prevention, with the remaining 80% going to care and treatment, laboratory support, antiretroviral drugs, TB/HIV services, support for orphans and vulnerable children (OVC), infrastructure, training, and other related services. Of the 20% spent on prevention, one third was to be spent on abstinence-until-marriage programs in fiscal years 2006 through 2008, a controversial requirement. The other two thirds was allotted for the widespread array of prevention interventions described above, including counseling, education, injection safety, blood safety and condoms.

The 2008 reathorisation of PEPFAR eliminated both the 20% recommendation for prevention efforts and the 33% requirement for abstinence programs.



International Aids Malaria and TB research

Pepfar

PEPFAR "has literally saved millions of lives," said Peter Piot, who stepped down at the end of last year after 13 years as head of the UN agency UNAIDS.

"In my mind, there's no doubt that Bush's legacy on AIDS is very positive."

Tachi Yamada, president of the Global Health Programme at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, said PEPFAR and Bush's malaria initiative "are real success stories."


Edited by Davidson Deac II, 03 February 2009 - 09:39 PM.