Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

This is going to be interesting


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
50 replies to this topic

#25 Htar

Htar

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,599
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2009 - 11:10 PM

funny reminder that homosexuality is rampant in saudi arabia, since it's illegal to be with a woman who isn't your wife and people are desperate for human touch.

the koran has weird rules about homosexuality, like it's legal unless seven people see you do it or stuff like that


Link that please...But, if true according to you analysis, that proves homosexuality is a choice.

#26 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2009 - 11:20 PM

Link that please...But, if true according to you analysis, that proves homosexuality is a choice.


The legal punishment for sodomy has varied among juristic schools: some prescribe capital punishment; while other prescribe a milder discretionary punishment. Homosexuality is a crime and forbidden in most Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. In some relatively secular or multi-religious Islamic countries, this is not the case, Indonesia and Turkey being some examples. Despite this, homoerotic themes were present in poetry and other literature by some Muslims which celebrated male love, and were more common than expressions of attraction to women.[1]

Some movements in Islam, such as the Al-Fatiha Foundation, accept and consider homosexuality as natural, either regarding Qur'anic verses as obsolete in the context of modern society, or pointing out that the Qu'ran speaks out against homosexual lust, and is silent on homosexual love. Writer Irshad Manji, a lesbian herself and a staunch critic of Islam,[2] is of the opinion that homosexuality is permissible within Islam; however, it only remains a minority viewpoint. Within the Shi'a school of thought in Islam, thinkers such as Ayatollah Khomeini have argued the legality of sex-change operations if a man is homosexual, and feels effeminate.[3]

Eminent scholars of Islam, such as Sheikh ul-Islam Imam Malik, Imam Shafi amongst others, rule that the Islam disallows homosexuality and ordains a capital punishment for a person guilty of it.[4]

very well sourced wikipedia article

also a segment of the population choosing to engage in homosexual acts doesn't prove that homosexuality as a whole is a choice.

#27 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,931
  • Reputation: 536
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:08 AM

liberals will always make out the US to be the bad guys.

#28 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:11 AM

liberals will always make out the US to be the bad guys.


Posted Image

#29 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,125
  • Reputation: 1,527
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:15 AM

wow that amazingly small percentage of people who have made money from the hydrocarbon economy really makes up for everything else.

so they should all organized in a proper ww2 style battle and get wiped out in a day? seems kind of foolish.

of who?

of a small group. historically, most revolutionaries that resort to terrorist attacks due it as a means to polarize the populations of occupied and occupier countries in an effort to politicize the army presence and get them out. this was first done effectively in algeria and has kinda been the blueprint of anti-colonialism since then.

i never mentioned any of those countries.



I wasn't responding to you.

#30 Myworldwideinc

Myworldwideinc

    My world

  • Joined: 01-February 09
  • PipPip
  • posts: 20
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 01 February 2009 - 04:18 AM

As much as you want him to be, no, he is not...
yes he is

#31 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,973
  • Reputation: 9,072
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:00 AM

Most of the families running the various nations in the Middle East have been in power for hundreds of years. Its ludicrous to think that the US is somehow responsible for oppression in Saudia Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Yemen, etc...


That's what I meant, did you miss my sarcasm or were you just agreeing with me?




wow that amazingly small percentage of people who have made money from the hydrocarbon economy really makes up for everything else.

It's not my defense and you just argued against yourself... you said that they were "systematically oppressed" by the US, did you not? But who is really oppresing them? It's their own governments that's who. It's like Deac says, they may be pissed at us for being on their soil and "corrupting" their values, but we do not oppress them, they do a fine job of that themselves.

so they should all organized in a proper ww2 style battle and get wiped out in a day? seems kind of foolish.

No obviously they cannot resist in that way... so is that your defense of them blowing up innocent people?


of who?[

Al Queada, PLO, Hamas, etc. all the arab terrorists groups and those that support them. And they do have a lot of support in middle eastern countries, although I am not saying 100% of all muslim arabs support terror. Just look at the aftermath of 911... thousands and thousands of Palestinians dancing and cheering in the streets.

of a small group. historically, most revolutionaries that resort to terrorist attacks due it as a means to polarize the populations of occupied and occupier countries in an effort to politicize the army presence and get them out. this was first done effectively in algeria and has kinda been the blueprint of anti-colonialism since then.


OK, so there's a precendence for these types of attacks, does make everything alright in your eyes?

#32 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,125
  • Reputation: 1,527
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:05 AM

Agreeing with you.

#33 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,863
  • Reputation: 2,553
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:44 AM

Of course we don't agree with them, they are against our interests.

When the Muhajadeen were wiping out Afgan villiages that supported the Soviet puppet regime back in the 1980s, we really didn't care. The Taliban do it now and they are subhuman.

Iraq gassing Iranian Army conscripts because they can't win a war they started? Here, have some of the important ingredients on us! Against the Kurds and Shiites while putting down an insurrection we promised to aid but then got cold feet on: terrible, unspeakable evil!

When we systematically destroyed entire populations in the Phillipines, it was for freedom and we as a nation supported it. When others do it, it's called "ethnic cleansing".

When we wiped out Vietnamese villiages on mere suspicion of aiding the VC, it was just "War is Hell". VC guerilla tactics made them sneaky, evil and vile.

We rationalize ours and our allies actions in order to justify our beliefs, but when our enemies use them they are evil and subhuman. Other then the number of enemies involved, what really, in the end, is the difference between carpet bombing a village and flying a plane into a building other than they get a greater return on their human investment?

#34 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,793
  • Reputation: 2,493
Moderators

Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:44 AM

To beat this point to death, the US has acted no worse than any empire in history. What annoys the world is how we act as we're superheros constantly ridding the world of evil and helping little old ladies cross the street.

#35 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,863
  • Reputation: 2,553
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:50 AM

True Dat. In fact given our power, we are probably a "better" nation than a lot of others. That still does not give us a pass, it just makes the bar get set higher for who we aspire to be.

#36 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,973
  • Reputation: 9,072
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:02 AM

Of course we don't agree with them, they are against our interests.

When the Muhajadeen were wiping out Afgan villiages that supported the Soviet puppet regime back in the 1980s, we really didn't care. The Taliban do it now and they are subhuman.

Iraq gassing Iranian Army conscripts because they can't win a war they started? Here, have some of the important ingredients on us! Against the Kurds and Shiites while putting down an insurrection we promised to aid but then got cold feet on: terrible, unspeakable evil!

When we systematically destroyed entire populations in the Phillipines, it was for freedom and we as a nation supported it. When others do it, it's called "ethnic cleansing".

When we wiped out Vietnamese villiages on mere suspicion of aiding the VC, it was just "War is Hell". VC guerilla tactics made them sneaky, evil and vile.

We rationalize ours and our allies actions in order to justify our beliefs, but when our enemies use them they are evil and subhuman. Other then the number of enemies involved, what really, in the end, is the difference between carpet bombing a village and flying a plane into a building other than they get a greater return on their human investment?


I've never once said nor thought that the US is blamless, innocent, or that we have not at points in our history committed atrocities. We have killed innocent people and done things that were completely morally wrong.

Obviously the US has and does act in it's own best interest and in some cases much to the detriment of others. We should look out for ourselves, but act morally at the same time, and others should as well.

But I get sick of hearing people defending these terrorist cowards saying something like, "oh these poor muslim people, they have no choice than to blow up others so that their plight will be heard." That's ridiculous and people defending their actions by saying, "oh yeah, well the US has done the same thing in the past", piss me off. It me cliche' but, two wrongs don't make a right.