Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Happy Panther

IS the NFL losing money...Jerry Richardson's 200M shortfall pie chart

41 posts in this topic

Risk is the key word. Players suck, owner takes risk and players get paid. Players do well, want to renegotiate. Hold out.

The rookie scale should free up money for the veterans. But you are right--risk is why this should not be viewed as equals slicing pie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Vets start getting better salaries, more guaranteed $$$, etc. depending on Salary cap.

Will make for a better game also, the Jarmcus Russell's will have to play good before they can really live large.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6% would be the operating margin by the numbers listed in Forbes (for the panthers)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being under Contract and then holding out like Revis just did, is something that needs to be stopped and I'm sure the Owners can't stand.

They need an agreement between owners that in that situation, the player not honoring his Contract will not be picked up by any other team and will not be paid at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is Operating Income? Merchandise, Tickets, Concessions? only, and not TV?

All I want to know(not that we have any Right to know, it is a Private Company) is the Yearly Cost and Yearly Income to Calculate the Net Profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking at the Forbes numbers, if reading that right the Panthers are operating on a 6% profit margin last year.

Bottom line is the Players/union takes None of the business Risk, but want to dictate their wages and use force through the threat of a Strike to get what they want, something they fundamentally, morally do not have a Right to.

If that is true, I am 100% on the owners side.

It's not exactly the same, but it reminds me of my dad growing up. He has been a licensed, bonded, insured contractor for 30 years. He has helped a lot of my friends and some family by letting them work for him to help make ends meet. He'd pay $15-$20/hour cash. I remember one guy that worked for him got butthurt because my dad made $700/day and he made like $150, and he felt like they were doing the same work. What he constantly failed to realize that if my dad got stiffed for the money, or there was a huge accident that cost $20,000 to fix, my dad assumed all of the risk, whereas the worker was getting paid regardless.

Sorry, but I'm not gonna bust my ass for 6%, and I god damn sure am not going to have any of my employees making more money than I am (ala Julius Peppers). Forget that noise!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is true, I am 100% on the owners side.

It's not exactly the same, but it reminds me of my dad growing up. He has been a licensed, bonded, insured contractor for 30 years. He has helped a lot of my friends and some family by letting them work for him to help make ends meet. He'd pay $15-$20/hour cash. I remember one guy that worked for him got butthurt because my dad made $700/day and he made like $150, and he felt like they were doing the same work. What he constantly failed to realize that if my dad got stiffed for the money, or there was a huge accident that cost $20,000 to fix, my dad assumed all of the risk, whereas the worker was getting paid regardless.

Sorry, but I'm not gonna bust my ass for 6%, and I god damn sure am not going to have any of my employees making more money than I am (ala Julius Peppers). Forget that noise!

not touching that one...:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in the 1990's there was this music group called TLC. They were very, very popular. The biggest hit was an albumn that sold over 10 million copies. They were also on a world tour that was bringing in a lot of money. The very next year all three members filed for bankruptcy. They famously explained why on an episode of Behind the Music on VH1. Watch that and it is very easy to see how an NFL team is losing money.

People just assume that higher revenues equal higher profits. It's just not true.

The one thing that players don't get is how they want 60% of the total and don't want the owners to take anything off the top. Yet, I don't see any players offering up any of their own money to help build a stadium, repave parking lots, rennovate the training facilities ect. The players have an unrealistic view how businesses operate. I really think they believe that any and all profits go into the owners pocket just like the players money goes into thier pocket.

As a whole, yes the NFL is probably not losing money. But when you brake it down team by team and factor in furture monies needed for investment, very few teams were making money under the last CBA.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like most businesses, even the big ones. Very little profit in them. But it's nice to think that the rich get richer...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites