Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

2011 Mock Offseason & Draft ~ GENERAL DISCUSSION


  • Please log in to reply
253 replies to this topic

#16 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 23 January 2011 - 07:51 PM

The Three aren't but everyone else is correct. As in you retain all FA's but 3?


Right, we're only treating the top 4 URFAs as actual FAs. All the other FAs will be treated just like any other player that's under contract.

#17 Carolina Crazy V2

Carolina Crazy V2

    !

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 07:54 PM

We also need to refer to this updated draft order because some teams are posting incorrect pick numbers in their posts.

#18 DynastyRTR

DynastyRTR

    newnfldraft.com writer

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,570 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:10 PM

We also need to refer to this updated draft order because some teams are posting incorrect pick numbers in their posts.


wouldnt I(Bills) have the 3rd pick in each round then? instead of the 2nd pick in the 2nd round and the 4th pick in the 3rd round?

#19 Carolina Crazy V2

Carolina Crazy V2

    !

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:11 PM

And I don't mean to be a pain in the ass, but I'm a little confused with your trading rules. It sounds like you are limiting trades to only one players and pick(s) per team. If that is the case, I think you should revise it. I think at least two players should be able to be involved per team, seeing as your limited to 3 trades.

#20 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:12 PM

wouldnt I(Bills) have the 3rd pick in each round then? instead of the 2nd pick in the 2nd round and the 4th pick in the 3rd round?


I think it switches around when there are teams with the same record.

#21 Carolina Crazy V2

Carolina Crazy V2

    !

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:13 PM

wouldnt I(Bills) have the 3rd pick in each round then? instead of the 2nd pick in the 2nd round and the 4th pick in the 3rd round?


No, you would have the 2nd pick in the 2nd round and the 4th pick in the 3rd round.

#22 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:15 PM

And I don't mean to be a pain in the ass, but I'm a little confused with your trading rules. It sounds like you are limiting trades to only one players and pick(s) per team. If that is the case, I think you should revise it. I think at least two players should be able to be involved per team, seeing as your limited to 3 trades.


No, one player and pick(s) involved in each trade. Boldin for a 3rd and 4th rounder would be acceptable. That would count as one transaction and each team can make 3 trades total.

#23 DynastyRTR

DynastyRTR

    newnfldraft.com writer

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,570 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:17 PM

I think it switches around when there are teams with the same record.


just checked. sounds good to me. just means i'll be picking 2nd in the 2nd round

#24 Carolina Crazy V2

Carolina Crazy V2

    !

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:38 PM

No, one player and pick(s) involved in each trade. Boldin for a 3rd and 4th rounder would be acceptable. That would count as one transaction and each team can make 3 trades total.


So, if I wanted to trade Melvin Bullitt and Daniel Muir for Mardy Gilyardvand a 7th rounder, I would not be able to?

#25 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:40 PM

Just one player per trade. Trying to keep things semi-realistic.

#26 Carolina Crazy V2

Carolina Crazy V2

    !

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,367 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:07 PM

Just one player per trade. Trying to keep things semi-realistic.


Hmmm... maybe you should contemplate a 2 players per trade limit, but be more strict with vetoes. Because often teams like to acquire a couple prospects in a trade rather than one established player.

#27 DynastyRTR

DynastyRTR

    newnfldraft.com writer

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,570 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:18 PM

Hmmm... maybe you should contemplate a 2 players per trade limit, but be more strict with vetoes. Because often teams like to acquire a couple prospects in a trade rather than one established player.


this

#28 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,716 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:21 PM

I'm fine with moving it to a two player per trade limit. Let's see what everyone else has to say. We still have till Friday before FA and trading begins.

#29 CaliPanthers

CaliPanthers

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 658 posts

Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:24 PM

I'm fine with moving it to a two player per trade limit. Let's see what everyone else has to say. We still have till Friday before FA and trading begins.


Im fine with it but i like the rules you have set ROCKnRoLLA, good job.

#30 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed Moncrief 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,258 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:25 PM

do i need to put up my top 4 fa again?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.