Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Cut Hackett


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
31 replies to this topic

#13 MurkN

MurkN

    Simple And Plain

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,109
  • Reputation: 1,245
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 01:24 PM

Washington would be an improvement, but why would he come to Carolina for less production than he would get at Pittsburgh? We only throw to Hackett once every four games, so it would sort of be a waste to bring him in. I'm all for it though.

#14 MurkN

MurkN

    Simple And Plain

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,109
  • Reputation: 1,245
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 01:26 PM

space we make on the roster needs to be used for defense.

we are fine on offense much more so than defense.

we have plenty of good options at WR already.

DEFENSE!!!!!

Yeah I almost forgot that we have Jarrett waiting in the wings, so its looking even less likely and our defense is what really needs to be fixed.

#15 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 49,598
  • Reputation: 10,082
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 01:36 PM

Hackett is a good receiver, when healthy. I know after last year we might not want to take that chance again, but the team is so stacked at the receiver position that I think we can afford to take that gamble again.

Smith, Moose, Jarrett, Hackett, Robinson, Jones and maybe Carter. We don't need any help at receiver. Not just yet.



How do you know that? Has he ever been healthy?

#16 pantherj

pantherj

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,199
  • Reputation: 588
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 01:50 PM

After the way Jake played against Arizona, I'm not looking to bring in more WRs. If anything, improve our defense and find a way to pay less for any WR not named Steve Smith.

#17 PowerlessDan

PowerlessDan

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 863
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 02:01 PM

The Panthers will not cut Hackett. The reasons are obvious. First, he's cheap. Zero reason to cut him, specially considering he is a good receiver.

Not saying the Panthers won't bring in more competition, but they won't cut Hackett just to bring in someone else.


I could see them promoting Jarrett and cutting Hackett though. If nothing else to free up a roster spot.

#18 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,698
  • Reputation: 3,695
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 02:21 PM

I hear what some of you are saying, but there is a belief among some that the receivers that we brought in to take the pressure away from Smitty have not worked out(no disrespect to Moose).
Personally, I don't know whether to blame it on the receivers, respect for their actual and/or perceived skills by the opposition, Jake's seeming reluctance to throw to anybody but Smitty and Moose, or uninspired and ineefective playcalling. Could be all of the above. Anyway, Hackett is a good receiver at times, but his production is inconsistent for whatever reasons (including injury).
Washington's stats are more consistent, and he appears to be more of threat to take it to the house.

The issue of consistency, alone, may warrant the we give him more than just a casual look. Moreover, he may just be a more legitimate threat in reality and in the eyes of the opposition, than Hackett will ever be. Notwithstanding needs on the defense, we could probably fit Washington in the budget if we get a real opportunity to sign him. An upgrade at WR that does not cost much, and that could yield marked improvements, is never a bad thing. Hackett would just have to go.

#19 CharlotteBeer.com

CharlotteBeer.com

    Resident Beer Nerd

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,700
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 02:52 PM

How do you know that? Has he ever been healthy?


He’s been healthy in the six games he’s played for Carolina. In those six games, he caught just about everything thrown his way. The same is true of Jarrett.

Their unsubstantial numbers last season are a result of how they are used in the offense, not their inability to catch the ball. How many times can you recall Colbert or Carter dropping a well thrown ball? It happened all the time.

Jarrett and Hackett are both better receivers than the two C’s. They just figured less prominently in our offense last year because we had one of the league’s best running games.

I understand why you would be leery to keep Hackett on given his past injuries with the Seahawks and with us. But ask yourself how often we really targeted or went to our third receiver—whether it be Jarrett or Hackett—and then ask yourself if we failed to use our third receiver based on talent.

We have talented wide receivers. As I said, both Jarrett and Hackett caught almost everything thrown their way this year. There is no need to bring in any receiver, whether it be through the draft or free agency.

I echo the other posters when I say that we need to spend on defense, and for the most part defense alone.

#20 CharlotteBeer.com

CharlotteBeer.com

    Resident Beer Nerd

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,700
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 02:58 PM

I hear what some of you are saying, but there is a belief among some that the receivers that we brought in to take the pressure away from Smitty have not worked out(no disrespect to Moose).


I don’t see how you could think that, seeing as how Moose had almost a 1,000-yard season. While it’s true that no other than Smith and Muhammad put up substantial numbers, that is because we did not target the other receivers. It’s important to spread the ball around and I hope we can improve on that as well, but you don’t need to as much with the running game we have.

#21 rippadonn

rippadonn

    Since 2006

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,021
  • Reputation: 200
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2009 - 04:17 PM

With his potential for injury Hackett will only be a third receiver. I too had high hopes but they were dashed away with the different injuries he's had since being a Panther for one year. He's good when he's on the field.

#22 Mjsilfies

Mjsilfies

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 06-February 09
  • PipPip
  • posts: 28
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 06 February 2009 - 12:18 AM

http://www.walterfoo...gents2009WR.php

he is number 4 on the list.

#23 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,653
  • Reputation: 2,301
HUDDLER

Posted 06 February 2009 - 09:57 AM

Do me a favor. Before anyone says things like cut Hackett and get such and such, do your homework. Put down some numbers to show how much we would save in salary or lose in dead cap space if we cut Hackett for example. And if we sign such and such, what are they currently making or what would it cost for them if we picked them up in free agency.

Otherwise it is like Madden. Unrealistic suggestions without consideration of the facts, cap, salary requirements, etc. In other words, a waste of space.

#24 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,574
  • Reputation: 1,267
HUDDLER

Posted 06 February 2009 - 10:43 AM

I think he's pretty cheap. We didn't pay much knowing his problems, but thought he was worth the gamble.