Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers begin background work on Fairley


  • Please log in to reply
118 replies to this topic

#46 ncbobcat

ncbobcat

    Beer Enthusiast

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,676 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 02:46 PM

Latita always starts threads from cloumns at the Observer as do other people. That's where we get these duplicate threads.

Edit: Salty beat me to it.

#47 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,405 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 25 January 2011 - 02:50 PM

Define: cloums 

#48 pauliewalnuts

pauliewalnuts

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 140 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 02:55 PM

just fresh is a Panera like store in Dilworth and he did sound like the kool aid man!

#49 ncbobcat

ncbobcat

    Beer Enthusiast

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,676 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 02:55 PM

Define: cloums 


My bad, coLumns. Sometimes the fingers type too fast and letters get switched.

#50 Highlandfire

Highlandfire

    There can be only one.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,319 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 02:59 PM

The guy brings a nasty streak, I love that!

#51 unicar15

unicar15

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,612 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:00 PM

I fully expect this guy to be our pick as long as nothing comes up as far as character or in the pre-draft process.


...and I fully expect the expectations to be way to high for him and for us to look back on that pick and give a few shoulda woulda couldas. This guy is the focus of the biggest hype train I have seen since the JaMarcus Russell pick.

If we don't at least try to trade back then IMO we are going to regret it. We have too many needs on the offensive side of the ball to take this kid #1 overall. So unless we get a playmaker at QB via free agency and probably a receiver as well then there is no way I am on board with taking a DT at #1.

#52 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,608 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:00 PM

The guy brings a nasty streak, I love that!


I would love a mean mentality in the trenches

#53 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,025 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:07 PM

Laetita is a bot. this thread was made first. I'm surprised u haven't figured this out by now.


whatever

#54 pauliewalnuts

pauliewalnuts

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 140 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:08 PM

man wouldn't that be nice if they had Laetita Bots.... :)

#55 The Saltman

The Saltman

    I have Returned

  • Moderators
  • 24,877 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:10 PM

whatever


back at ya. just stating the obvious didnt mean for it to come off as it did.

#56 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,608 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:11 PM

I don't follow the logic on not taking X position number 1 overall... With my hindsight goggles, given the opportunity, I'd take Polomalu #1, Fitzgerald #1, Suh #1, Aso#1, etc. In a few years from now, I'll be saying the same thing about another player from this draft that wasn't taken #1. Point being, you can't say to me that if you knew how let's say, Champ Bailey was going to be, and in the draft, he's there at number 1 overall alongside Ryan Leaf and Robert Gallery, you'd take OT or QB over CB in that scenario. #1 should be BPA, where the P stands for player, not position.

#57 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,025 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:15 PM

back at ya. just stating the obvious didnt mean for it to come off as it did.


we're good.

#58 ncbobcat

ncbobcat

    Beer Enthusiast

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,676 posts

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:24 PM

I would love a mean mentality in the trenches


Apparently a nasty streak equates to a dirty player to some.

#59 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,608 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:36 PM

Apparently a nasty streak equates to a dirty player to some.


Go figure. Granted, I don't want him going all Haynesworth and cleet-stomping a dude, but playing nasty is a good thing (esp for a DT). It's energetic and prideful, and something we need to go along with the agressive approach RR wants to run. No more helping the opponent up after a play. Play with respect, but also hate the opponents guts until that whistle blows.

#60 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,405 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 25 January 2011 - 03:40 PM

Go figure. Granted, I don't want him going all Haynesworth and cleet-stomping a dude, but playing nasty is a good thing (esp for a DT). It's energetic and prideful, and something we need to go along with the agressive approach RR wants to run. No more helping the opponent up after a play. Play with respect, but also hate the opponents guts until that whistle blows.


Can't find a single idea here I disagree with.

Rep.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.