So who wants to get Cam Newton?
#1
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:23 PM
Defend yourself.
#2
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:39 PM
So you want Cam Newton huh? Hey.. aren't you that guy that criticizes Hurney for getting Armanti Edwards with a 2nd rounder? Yea? Well, you think that Hurney should be fired just for using a 2nd rounder on a project WR in Edwards, right? Right. But let me get this straight, you want to use the first pick in the draft.... or hell, any pick in the first round to get a project QB that is no different from Hurney's 2nd round project WR in ridiculousness? So.... Doesn't that make you an idiot? Yes, yes it does.
Defend yourself.
I can see your arguement but I am sorry they are not the same. I am not saying the Panthers should draft Newton - I have no idea BUT trading a 2nd round pick for guy that played Div 1AA QB, to convert him to a WR that most likely could have been picked much later in the draft - in a draft in which you took two other WR's - is NOT the same as drafting in the 1st round a Division 1 starting QB who is a first round talent. Sure both are projects, but completely different ones on different levels.
#3
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:43 PM
#4
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:47 PM
Sign a couple of veterans, take them to camp with Clausen and Pike. Best three get to stick around.
#5
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:49 PM
#6
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:50 PM
#7
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:52 PM
#8
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:52 PM
Did you just post a rambling strawman argument with no basis in fact & then demand someone defend it? Yes... yes you did.So you want Cam Newton huh? Hey.. aren't you that guy that criticizes Hurney for getting Armanti Edwards with a 2nd rounder? Yea? Well, you think that Hurney should be fired just for using a 2nd rounder on a project WR in Edwards, right? Right. But let me get this straight, you want to use the first pick in the draft.... or hell, any pick in the first round to get a project QB that is no different from Hurney's 2nd round project WR in ridiculousness? So.... Doesn't that make you an idiot? Yes, yes it does.
Defend yourself.
#9
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:52 PM
No rookie QBs. Not Newton, not Locker, not Mallett, not Gabbert, nobody. We've got enough youth there.
Sign a couple of veterans, take them to camp with Clausen and Pike. Best three get to stick around.
I agree with the veterans. I would just take either Newton, Gabbert or Locker and get rid of Pike. Then the best one starts and the next best is the backup. It isn't having youth but the potential to be the future. If the vet is supposed to start then both the new rookie and Clausen can sit back and learn.
Then between the 3 we have the present and future and won't worry about Luck or whoever might be there next year or after and we don't have to start over again if Clausen isn't the one.
#10
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:54 PM
have we had a thread on him?
#11
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:54 PM
Sweet, King T has joined this thread. Enjoy the thread while it lasts. This bad boy is moving to Tinderbox in about 5 minutes.
There's been plenty of "Newton" threads that remained in this forum. Nice try.
#12
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:55 PM
#13
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:56 PM
Oh well.
#14
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:56 PM
Defend yourself.
#15
Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:57 PM
thanks for the post from 2005
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked
