Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

One thing i think A.J. Green fans don't realize


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
66 replies to this topic

#61 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    Dey Hate Us Because They Aint Us!

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,935
  • Reputation: 2,310
HUDDLER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 01:05 AM

the thing is with 2 wide receivers that can command double coverage what happens then is you can send Lafell or Gettis in the slot to catch passes, then you can have a TE that will be catching passes over the middle, and also the threat of 1 very good back (2 if DeAngelo returns) and 1 good back (Goodson), Top it off with an offensive line that can pass block and give the QB time, and someone who knows what plays to call, and we're good to go.

our passing game's been anemic for years. our offense has more to gain if we draft green than the defense does by drafting fairley


You just do not get it...we need a TE only!

Oh wait you do!

#62 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    Dey Hate Us Because They Aint Us!

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,935
  • Reputation: 2,310
HUDDLER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:02 AM

Realize this..can your receiver glow green? Didn't think so.



#63 Icege

Icege

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • Joined: 28-December 09
  • posts: 2,127
  • Reputation: 848
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:08 AM

For those that seemed to have completely missed the point of the opening post:

WR and QB were last year's offensive needs.

Now it's TE and QB. QB will most likely be addressed through free agency, leaving TE. The team drafted three WRs last year. Two of them performed quite well given the circumstances while the other from everything I've read/heard basically got kicked to the side until the coming season.

Smith(?), Gettis, LaFell, Edwards, Wright (he's going to be here next year folks)
vs.
King(?), Rosario(?), Barnidge

(?) = uncertain to be back

If somebody wants to make this about the #1 overall pick, we can go that route as well!

Smith(?), Gettis, LaFell, Edwards, Wright
vs.
Landri(?), Irvin, Neblett, Taylor

When you're done swallowing back down the vomit the appeared in your mouth from reading what is going on in the DT position, make sure you set your DVR for the Senior Bowl and the Combine and get ready to see if AJ Green really should be taken #1 overall with what everything else that is missing from the roster.

And before anybody tries to jump the gun, I made NO mention of Fairley. CB is another position of interest as well. I'm part of the "waiting for more information" crowd ^.^

#64 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,618
  • Reputation: 1,647
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 11:14 AM

For those that seemed to have completely missed the point of the opening post:

WR and QB were last year's offensive needs.

Now it's TE and QB. QB will most likely be addressed through free agency, leaving TE. The team drafted three WRs last year. Two of them performed quite well given the circumstances while the other from everything I've read/heard basically got kicked to the side until the coming season.

Smith(?), Gettis, LaFell, Edwards, Wright (he's going to be here next year folks)
vs.
King(?), Rosario(?), Barnidge

(?) = uncertain to be back

If somebody wants to make this about the #1 overall pick, we can go that route as well!

Smith(?), Gettis, LaFell, Edwards, Wright
vs.
Landri(?), Irvin, Neblett, Taylor

When you're done swallowing back down the vomit the appeared in your mouth from reading what is going on in the DT position, make sure you set your DVR for the Senior Bowl and the Combine and get ready to see if AJ Green really should be taken #1 overall with what everything else that is missing from the roster.

And before anybody tries to jump the gun, I made NO mention of Fairley. CB is another position of interest as well. I'm part of the "waiting for more information" crowd ^.^


what if we drafted Green and signed Cofield?

then this wall of text is then even more useless..

Edited by bleys, 28 January 2011 - 11:17 AM.


#65 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,618
  • Reputation: 1,647
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 11:16 AM

the thing is with 2 wide receivers that can command double coverage what happens then is you can send Lafell or Gettis in the slot to catch passes, then you can have a TE that will be catching passes over the middle, and also the threat of 1 very good back (2 if DeAngelo returns) and 1 good back (Goodson), Top it off with an offensive line that can pass block and give the QB time, and someone who knows what plays to call, and we're good to go.

our passing game's been anemic for years. our offense has more to gain if we draft green than the defense does by drafting fairley


ahhh! so this is what it looks like to see someone else who has a clue...



oh, btw, by posting this, everyone should assume DT was totally ignored and will never be addressed... just want to cement that in your minds...

#66 Icege

Icege

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • Joined: 28-December 09
  • posts: 2,127
  • Reputation: 848
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 12:16 PM

what if we drafted Green and signed Cofield?

then this wall of text is then even more useless..


Ifs & buts, candy & nuts, Merry Christmas.

#67 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,618
  • Reputation: 1,647
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:37 PM

Ifs & buts, candy & nuts, Merry Christmas.


well said....