Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Highlandfire

Would the Jerry Richardson haters STFU or find a new team?

93 posts in this topic

Jerry Richardson is an old dolt with a feeble mind that has no business running a professional football team. Age and health issues hit the best of them, this isn't something limited to Richardson. I won't deny he used to be good for this team, but he's much more of an Al Davis/Daniel Snyder type now than a Bob Kraft/Dan Rooney. Until he hands the reins over to someone else, I fear for this team and, heck, for the league as a whole if he keeps his crap up in labor negotiations.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, LOL at the notion that he "did it RIGHT the last year or so". Yeah okay. Nothing says doing it right like 2-14 and the worst team in franchise history.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Criticism of those in charge is what this world does. Get used to it, OP, or go gargle bees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha OP has it ever occurred to you how the USA the country you live in, came to be what it is today. It is because people who lived here did not agree with the "owner" of the land so they fought for what was right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highlandfire is the new Not-Awesomeness.

Except maybe worse.

AwesomeHeader5.png

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't go 2-14 from doing things right.

He took a risk last season and the negatives were grossly miscalculated. It happens in business and life.

Moving on :)

Sweet, Sino-Riders. My childhood!

Er... dino riders. Damn Droid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha OP has it ever occurred to you how the USA the country you live in, came to be what it is today. It is because people who lived here did not agree with the "owner" of the land so they fought for what was right.

Actually the "owner" of the land was the Native Americans. Europeans taking their land isn't exactly fighting for what was right :D But yeah I wouldn't call 2-14 doing it right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the "owner" of the land was the Native Americans. Europeans taking their land isn't exactly fighting for what was right :D But yeah I wouldn't call 2-14 doing it right.

So if my anthro. prof. was correct and the Native Americans came here from Asia crossing a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska....is it really "their" land?.......just asking.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if my anthro. prof. was correct and the Native Americans came here from Asia crossing a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska....is it really "their" land?.......just asking.;)

If they were the first here to claim the land then I would say so :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites