Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OchoNueve

Why we draft a QB #1 overall = Tony Pike

38 posts in this topic

The only way we don't draft a QB #1 overall is if the Panthers are sold on Tony Pike. I know it sounds crazy, but hear me out.... Even if they still believe that Clausen could be their franchise guy and choose a position other than QB #1 overall, it is "putting all your eggs in one basket" that he is the QB of the future and all he needs is time to develop. Competition breeds greatness and if we don't select a QB #1 overall and choose to get a "stop gap" QB, then we are left with Clausen competing with Tony Pike and a "Stop Gap" veteran to become this "great" QB for the future. When the dust settles in a season or two and a final verdict has been reached, maybe Clausen has proved himself worthy, but maybe he hasn't and where has that left us as an organization? With an aging "stop gap" ready to retire , Tony Pike, and most likely another opportunity to select a QB high in the draft.

For those saying Cam Newton or Gabbert is a bust or not worthy of #1 overall... You may be correct. But why not take a shot now so we have two (three if you count Pike, i don't) highly touted, young prospects fight for the opportunity to be a franchise QB instead of just putting all the faith in Jimmy? That is all the draft is... a shot in the dark. No matter what position you choose, you are putting a lot of faith in one person to be a great player for years to come. If we take that shot in the dark on Cam or Gabbert, maybe Clausen beats out the competition, maybe Cam or Gabbert runs away with it, maybe they all suck, maybe we have the Next Kolb/Vick combo playing behind center... At least I will sleep well knowing that whomever is starting for my Carolina Panthers won the job outright in a competitive environment instead of being given the position by default.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

new coaching staffs never are sold on leftover QBs. That is why they always go out and find their own guys pending they didn't inherit a Superbowl QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't draft a QB # 1 overall because there are no QB's in this draft even close to being worth a # 1 overall pick... has nothing to do with Pike.

Look at Hurney's draft history, we take safe picks... this tells me it will be Bowers or Dareus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't draft a QB # 1 overall because there are no QB's in this draft even close to being worth a # 1 overall pick... has nothing to do with Pike.

Look at Hurney's draft history, we take safe picks... this tells me it will be Bowers or Dareus.

trading away a first rounder for an undersized 2nd round DE doesn't scream safe. Looked like a reach when a team knew they were about to have a huge hole at DE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't draft a QB # 1 overall because there are no QB's in this draft even close to being worth a # 1 overall pick... has nothing to do with Pike.

Look at Hurney's draft history, we take safe picks... this tells me it will be Bowers or Dareus.

I respectfully disagree with you.

Bradford wasn't as good as Suh, but they took a chance on him, seemed to work out his first year.

I'm about 81.78% positive that we take a QB with our pick. whether it is gabbert or newton is yet to be determined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is worse than your Hard Knocks thread.

Ahh, yes another thread in which you are a complete douche

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I respectfully disagree with you.

Bradford wasn't as good as Suh, but they took a chance on him, seemed to work out his first year.

I'm about 81.78% positive that we take a QB with our pick. whether it is gabbert or newton is yet to be determined.

good point. Suh > Bradford. However, the Rams knew getting that QB play would have the biggest overall impact on the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reread the OP for the 3rd time and still have no idea what Tony Pike has to do with anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

trading away a first rounder for an undersized 2nd round DE doesn't scream safe. Looked like a reach when a team knew they were about to have a huge hole at DE.

Depends on how you look at it, missing on a guy in the 2nd round is a much less expensive mistake then missing on a guy in the first round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites