Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OchoNueve

Why we draft a QB #1 overall = Tony Pike

38 posts in this topic

There are no safe picks in the draft. Dareus only benched 24 reps of 225... poor... and weak.. less then some RB's and WR.

Peterson is only 6'0", fairly was a 1 year wonder...

The only way it is a safe pick will be in 3 years when they are dominating on a high level....

It's MUCH easier to improve a guys strength than it is to teach him to read defenses, go through progressions and make all the throws from a 3, 5 and 7 step drops...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how you look at it, missing on a guy in the 2nd round is a much less expensive mistake then missing on a guy in the first round.

Let's just be grateful that Hurney was not successful in finding a 'trade up' partner to draft Clausen last year, or we would be even more screwed than we are now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way we don't draft a QB #1 overall is if the Panthers are sold on Tony Pike. I know it sounds crazy, but hear me out.... Even if they still believe that Clausen could be their franchise guy and choose a position other than QB #1 overall, it is "putting all your eggs in one basket" that he is the QB of the future and all he needs is time to develop. Competition breeds greatness and if we don't select a QB #1 overall and choose to get a "stop gap" QB, then we are left with Clausen competing with Tony Pike and a "Stop Gap" veteran to become this "great" QB for the future. When the dust settles in a season or two and a final verdict has been reached, maybe Clausen has proved himself worthy, but maybe he hasn't and where has that left us as an organization? With an aging "stop gap" ready to retire , Tony Pike, and most likely another opportunity to select a QB high in the draft.

For those saying Cam Newton or Gabbert is a bust or not worthy of #1 overall... You may be correct. But why not take a shot now so we have two (three if you count Pike, i don't) highly touted, young prospects fight for the opportunity to be a franchise QB instead of just putting all the faith in Jimmy? That is all the draft is... a shot in the dark. No matter what position you choose, you are putting a lot of faith in one person to be a great player for years to come. If we take that shot in the dark on Cam or Gabbert, maybe Clausen beats out the competition, maybe Cam or Gabbert runs away with it, maybe they all suck, maybe we have the Next Kolb/Vick combo playing behind center... At least I will sleep well knowing that whomever is starting for my Carolina Panthers won the job outright in a competitive environment instead of being given the position by default.

Dont you know?? Dont you know the unknown QB the Panthers pick in NEXT years 1st round is going to be able to come in right away, start and be a superstar? He is also clearly better than Cam and Gabbert and will develop much faster.

Oh by the way............ I am being sarcastic, but that is how many feel. Some want to continue to keep passing this down the road thinking that will get us a franchise QB. I mean look, its worked all these years, passing on 1st round QB talent :-) (again being sarcastic) If Hurney, Rivera, etc think Cam or even Gabbert will be a great QB then they need to and will pick one.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After looking closer at the draft selection, the fact we didn't franchise Johnson, I have a feeling we go for Bowers number one. If not Bowers than definitely Peterson, and hopefully Hurney has a sleeper DE waiting in the 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After looking closer at the draft selection, the fact we didn't franchise Johnson, I have a feeling we go for Bowers number one. If not Bowers than definitely Peterson, and hopefully Hurney has a sleeper DE waiting in the 3rd.

had no choice but to franchise Kalil. Johnson is now there top priority imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if Rivera lobbies like hell to draft a QB # 1 overall and that QB is a bust... goodbye Rivera, you've just set the franchise back at least 5 years.

Personally I think Rivera will want to address the QB position with a veteran.

This to me is flawed logic. People think this is the safer play but it really isn't. If it is it isn't by that much.

You get a vet one of two ways. FA or trade.

FA QB's that get picked up rarely (if ever) work out. Generally speaking there is a reason they are a FA.

Every once in a while a good QB will hit the market. Like Brees or Vick. Then every team that needs a QB go after him. They drive the price up and up until you end up vastly over paying for a QB who wasn't good enough to play for his original team.

If you want good value for a FA QB we need more of them to go to prison for 2 years:D:D

Generally speaking, if a QB is any good he never makes it to FA. He is traded.

So let's trade for one? Well now your talking about an investment that is every bit as expensive for the future of your franchise as drafting a bust.

Kolb will set the price in this market and the Eagles are asking 2 first round draft picks. If you make this deal there still isn't a guarantee that this guy will work out. McNabb flourished in the Eagles pass happy offense but is about to be cut after just one year at the Redskins. Kolb could likely do the same thing.

Plus if you trade for a backup with the intention of starting him, the next day after the trade is official, the QBs agent (if he is doing his job) is asking for a new contract with a starters salary.

Keep in mind this is all for trading for a player that right now isn't good enough to start for his current team.

BUT if a QB you traded two first round picks (or a first and second) flames out you also have lost important building blocks to your future. While the QB you just traded for busts you are also missing on upgrading important positions bc you don't have the high draft picks to restock your roster.

So now your QB stinks and your roster is regressing. That in itself can set you back at least 5 year.

On the flip side if you draft a QB and he busts you are hurt financially (big time) but you have not wasted any future picks and you are continuing to (hopefully) build a strong roster through the draft so when the QB position finally does get resolved you are in a better situation to be successful.

So vet QB's are not the safer route. At least not significantly safer. And can be just as costly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just be grateful that Hurney was not successful in finding a 'trade up' partner to draft Clausen last year, or we would be even more screwed than we are now.

This x 5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how you look at it, missing on a guy in the 2nd round is a much less expensive mistake then missing on a guy in the first round.

Yes but one thing your forgetting, under any new CBA there will be a salary cap for drafted rookies. The days of paying a rookie $65M right out of college is over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is either Bowers or Dareus a safe pick? Bowers just had MCL surgery in January, and Dareus only did 24 reps of 225, less then some WR and Runningbacks, Patrick Perterson is only 6'0".... the bottom line is.. no pick is a safe pick until they perform in the NFL. I trust the coaching staff to do their homework and select the guy that best fits what they want to do. If that is a QB, I hope it works, if its a DT,DE,WR,CB/S, I hope it works.

If that's the only knock then you have to be happy. If that's your only criteria for drafting dlinemen then you pick Paea

If we don't draft a QB, Tony Pike is Clausen's competition.

If Tony Pike sucks then Clausen doesn't have competition.

Clausen needs competition.

If the Panthers are not sold on Tony Pike being good competition for starter, then I believe we will draft a QB #1 overall.

And in response...

Why would you think that if we don't draft a QB that we wouldn't sign a FA?

This. Get this through everyone's head.

There are no safe picks in the draft. Dareus only benched 24 reps of 225... poor... and weak.. less then some RB's and WR.

Peterson is only 6'0", fairly was a 1 year wonder...

The only way it is a safe pick will be in 3 years when they are dominating on a high level....

Please stop with the bench. It tests muscle endurance not explosiveness or strength. Strength can be easily corrected with an NFL lifting regimen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you think that if we don't draft a QB that we wouldn't sign a FA?

I think we will whether we draft one or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites