Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthers_Lover

Obama hand-picks journalists

29 posts in this topic

From the Wall Street Journal:

Obama's Press List

Membership shall have its privileges.

About half-way through President Obama's press conference Monday night, he had an unscripted question of his own. "All, Chuck Todd," the President said, referring to NBC's White House correspondent. "Where's Chuck?" He had the same strange question about Fox News's Major Garrett: "Where's Major?"

The problem wasn't the lighting in the East Room. The President was running down a list of reporters preselected to ask questions. The White House had decided in advance who would be allowed to question the President and who was left out.

The Opinion Journal Widget

Download Opinion Journal's widget and link to the most important editorials and op-eds of the day from your blog or Web page.

Presidents are free to conduct press conferences however they like, but the decision to preselect questioners is an odd one, especially for a White House famously pledged to openness. We doubt that President Bush, who was notorious for being parsimonious with follow-ups, would have gotten away with prescreening his interlocutors. Mr. Obama can more than handle his own, so our guess is that this is an attempt to discipline reporters who aren't White House favorites.

Few accounts of Monday night's event even mentioned the curious fact that the White House had picked its speakers in advance. We hope that omission wasn't out of fear of being left off the list the next time.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123431418276770899.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Betcha he doesn't field any more questions from Garrett any time soon. Any takers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

molehill, thou art hereby promoted to Mountain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

molehill, thou art hereby promoted to Mountain

Seems to be the general attitude of liberals when it comes to the liberal president ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to be the general attitude of liberals when it comes to the liberal president ....

Whats funny about that statement is I'm a long way from a liberal.

So in retort to your comment Ill say:

Typical response from a Ralph Reed worshiping right wing nutjob who drank the Neocon Kool-Aid and cant see that the Right is so far wrong these days that they are doing more harm than good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats funny about that statement is I'm a long way from a liberal.

So in retort to your comment Ill say:

Typical response from a Ralph Reed worshiping right wing nutjob who drank the Neocon Kool-Aid and cant see that the Right is so far wrong these days that they are doing more harm than good.

That's funny. The right aren't in power any more, Don Quixote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next they will be reporting that presidents also sign bills into law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's funny. The right aren't in power any more, Don Quixote.

Is your contention that they must be in power to do harm?

What about the harm they do by eroding the relative balance of the two party system by constantly creeping further and further right until those of us that have long supported the GOP find that they can no longer support the move to a Christian Theocracy that the Right seems to be embracing?

I don't know if I'm more entertained or dismayed by the "You're either with us or you're a bleeding heart left wing commie ***" of today's Republican party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next they will be reporting that presidents also sign bills into law.

Or that Obama is just as full of poo as Bush and Clinton before him. Oh wait, that WON'T get reported. Carry on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would you rather Montenegro be in NATO or be swallowed up by Russia?  To me that is an easy answer.  and I agree NATO has morphed.  I don't think that is a bad thing.  US does bear more than anyone on their shoulders.  That isn't a bad deal but just a reality IMO.  Only a bad deal really if we engage Russia or have to defend Russia though IMO.  As for the rest of the time....everyone else gets bad deal because they have to spend all the other years involved in everything we get them mixed up in. 
    • Yep, lived in Belmar for just a few months when we first moved out here in '07. Got up to Evergreen as quick as we could. I used to go to just about all the Broncos home games. Company had a suite at Mile High and I was the only employee in the state. Kinda made tickets a shoo-in. Sent through security with Elway a couple of times the season before he became the GM. Honestly don't have anything against the Broncos nor their fans, always had a good time at their games, but fug Aqib Talib. That guy's a piece of poo and that feels like an insult to pieces of poo.