I have not heard any pro Cam guys claiming such....only that has potential/ceiling was so high that it was worth the risk.
I didn't realize there was even a Gabbert bandwagon.
here's the thing you all need to understand...
realistically, how can you separate the 2? you have your opinions.. I include both because there's no way I can say Gabbert will fail and Newton will succeed or vice versa..
You all claim to know this secret information.. The same "pro Cam" guys can be said about "Pro Gabbert".. you may not see many in this forum, but this forum isn't the end all, be all in the football world. Matter of fact, the only 1's who do matter are the teams picking these 2 guys.
Great reports have come out about both. Only fools will sit down on a computer and act like they know more about one player than the other.
Cam has a lot of potential, but that doesn't mean poo if he becomes a bust and you all spent all off season criticizing people for being ignorant or conservative because they didn't see much difference to take a chance on Newton.
Fact is, Newton has some glaring concerns that we'll have to wait and see if they are a big deal or not.
Charlie Casserly spoke today about his concerns that Newton missed a lot of players last year who were wide open. His ability to process information is a major concern. (for the record, JUST LIKE WITH EVERY QB. WHITE OR BLACK.)
the fact that you just took my comment which included both and tried to divert my point into Cam -vs- Gabbert speaks volumes about this forum recently.
None of you f**kers have a clue what will happen in the future. Yet you beat your chest like you know something someone else hasn't figured out.
Newton has just as many concerns as Gabbert. Gabbert has just as many physical attributes as Newton, minus 20LBS. Both need to know how to process information and no one can point to FACTS about why one can and the other can't.
btw, no offense CRA.. I'm saying this to anyone.