Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

To Mr. Scot and those who share his view.


  • Please log in to reply
126 replies to this topic

#61 Icege

Icege

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • ALL-PRO
  • 1,840 posts
  • LocationCharleston, SC

Posted 21 April 2011 - 06:50 AM

Analyst are split saying we should take Luck #1 while others say we should take a different prospect. Everything about the Panthers and the NFL exist as it does this very minute. Also Cam Newton does not exist in this scenario so do not even bring his name up in this thread please.


Same reason people who want Newton think he is worth the number 1 pick even though he is not the BPA. Not sure how you don't understand the idea behind the thread.[/b] If I can add something to the op to make it more clear please let me know.


But... but... in the first post, you said...

You couldn't wait five posts to blow that "THIS IS MY POINT" load, could you?

#62 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 20,086 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 06:52 AM

Honestly, I am more looking forward to the draft not to see who we select, but just so all this garbage will stop.

#63 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,374 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:00 AM

With every Cam thread posted, my IQ takes yet another hit

With every lockout thread posted, my soul dies a little more

At this rate, in two months I'll have been reduced to a Falcons fan

#64 Jaxel

Jaxel

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,304 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:06 AM

This question makes no sense because a). Luck was considered the BPA coming out this year B). We are making assumptions that he will not be the BPA next year even though he is already rated number 1 next year and c). In terms of be pro-ready with the capability to start right away, Luck blows Cam Newton away.

Also Luck didn't come out of no where and he showed promise and consistency both years that he has been a starter, including taking Stanford, and school with high academic standard with lesser athletes to the Orange Bowl and blew out VT.

In terms of who's a better prospect and a BPA in position of need, Luck blows any and all of the QB prospects in this class, and possibly next class away. I don't think anybody is arguing who is a better prospect between Landry Jones and Barkely and Luck. Right now Luck is at the top tier of every draft board and more than likely will be the number 1 pick next year weather you want to take off your cam hugging glasses or not.

#65 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,033 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:09 AM

Luck is more cerebral and accurate. He has no character concerns, other than positive ones. He is a franchise QB and will have much more experience. In addition, he made Stanford a winner.

If you only focus on Cam's upside, you probably have difficulty seeing the difference. You draft the whole player, not the highlight reel. A QB is an investment. The safe pick here is also the best player. Folks, if you really know football, this question is not even hitting the table.

#66 Verge

Verge

    Huddle Captain

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,584 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:10 AM

Posted Image

#67 firstdayfan

firstdayfan

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,629 posts
  • LocationColumbia, SC

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:12 AM

The situation is flawed bc Luck is and will be the BPA. Those that say he isn't as good as advertised or over-hyped need to actually watch him play. He's as good on the field as any QB in the last decade or more. He also has no off the field issues, he's intelligent, competitive, and a great leader. Luck is exactly what the "media" has said he is...and if we draft Newton and end up with the first overall pick again someone will pay out the butt to get him.

#68 Lumps

Lumps

    watch porn

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,322 posts
  • LocationSouth Charlotte

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:40 AM

Luck is more cerebral and accurate. He has no character concerns, other than positive ones. He is a franchise QB and will have much more experience. In addition, he made Stanford a winner.

If you only focus on Cam's upside, you probably have difficulty seeing the difference. You draft the whole player, not the highlight reel. A QB is an investment. The safe pick here is also the best player. Folks, if you really know football, this question is not even hitting the table.


^ exactly. Luck has more upside overall, combined in all areas. He also won't take as long to develop and could possibly contribute sooner. Cam, I am afraid is not in the same boat as Luck, hype says otherwise.

#69 Millions

Millions

    #ThankYouBasedCam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts
  • LocationRaleigh, N.C.

Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:14 AM

The situation is flawed bc Luck is and will be the BPA. Those that say he isn't as good as advertised or over-hyped need to actually watch him play. He's as good on the field as any QB in the last decade or more. He also has no off the field issues, he's intelligent, competitive, and a great leader. Luck is exactly what the "media" has said he is...and if we draft Newton and end up with the first overall pick again someone will pay out the butt to get him.

In your opinion he will be but Fact is no one truly knows if he is the player he's advertised as same goes for Newton or any other prospects. Luck could end up like Locker we just have to wait and see if that holds true or not.

I feel with our need for a QB now we have to take the one with the most talent and upside while we are in the position to do so.

#70 TarPanther9180

TarPanther9180

    Ready for football

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,805 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:38 AM

Honestly, I am more looking forward to the draft not to see who we select, but just so all this garbage will stop.


It won't or will be replaced by a bunch of "I told you so" and "what now haters?" threads.

#71 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,357 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:41 AM

^ exactly. Luck has more upside overall, combined in all areas. He also won't take as long to develop and could possibly contribute sooner. Cam, I am afraid is not in the same boat as Luck, hype says otherwise.


No way to know that for sure.......Clausen was suppose to be able to function before The Golden Calf of Bristol. Opposite was the reality though.

I think Cam's ceiling is just as high as anyone that has come out in recent years.

#72 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,420 posts
  • LocationTulsa, OK

Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:51 AM

I'd take Luck if he is head and shoulders above every other QB prospect in the draft.. and we don't have a franchise QB. If we think he could be out guy, we take him. Luck has the production, the smarts, and the clean background check. Cam Newton just has the production.

#73 TarPanther9180

TarPanther9180

    Ready for football

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,805 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:05 AM

BPA doesn't always mean that they will be a great pick....especially at #1. As far as the scenario goes, I pick Luck. He is more polished and proven than Cam, so the risk isn't as high.

If Cam or Luck wasn't available....I'm going Dareus or Green.

#74 Pox 08

Pox 08

    Luck of the Fryrish

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,918 posts

Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:27 AM

I do wonder how most people think that Luck has zero character flaws. Was he put under the same microscope that Newton, Mallet and Gabbert were put under?

#75 Millions

Millions

    #ThankYouBasedCam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts
  • LocationRaleigh, N.C.

Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:33 AM

I do wonder how most people think that Luck has zero character flaws. Was he put under the same microscope that Newton, Mallet and Gabbert were put under?

He's a nerd he can't have character flaws Posted Image


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com