Predict out 2010 record with Newton as QB
#1
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:46 AM
I say we have the same record with Newton as QB, maybe one more win because he could have scrambled for a couple of those red zone drives we couldn't score. 3-13
With Brady 5-11.
I am sure many will say that Newton needs time to develop so you can't throw him in the first year. I agree 100% but Clausen needed a year or two to develop and so does every rookie. So why is everyone ready to throw him to the wolves after one year? Will Cam at the helm in 2011 make us any better? I agree he will not start after the Clausen experiment, but Cam is a couple year project at best. So what do we do until then?
This is why I think we need to draft Dareus, Green, or PP and get a vet QB and let Clausen rest a year. If Clausen was coming out this year in the draft he would probably be rated as the #1 QB hands down. My whole point is you can't rule any player out after one year and throwing a ton of money at a project with huge upside isn't the direction we need to go. If we grab a vet and stink again this year, we will have a short at a high pick next year when it looks like a better qb class is coming out.
#2
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:48 AM
#3
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:48 AM
Tom Brady would have a similar record, basically because he doesn't know any of the personnel, the offense, and he's outside of the "well-oiled machine" that is New England.
Great QBs become great with consistency. They become comfortable in a certain system, and then things start to work from there on.
#4
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:48 AM
With Newton 4-12. He will have a huge learning curve.
#5
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:49 AM
With Moore + Dareus - 8-8
Clausen + Dareus - 6-10
Gabbert - 6-10
Brady + Dareus - 12-4
Edited by Verge, 26 April 2011 - 09:52 AM.
#6
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:49 AM
Brady 7-9...smitty would have had a great year...people would not have been able to stack the box allowing the running game to do well. But injuries to the o-line would have limited the success of the running game and lack of a dt or much pass rush outside of johnson would have made every game a shoot out.
#7
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:53 AM
#8
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:53 AM
#9
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:55 AM
#10
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:56 AM
This argument doesn't really hold any water.
Tom Brady would have a similar record, basically because he doesn't know any of the personnel, the offense, and he's outside of the "well-oiled machine" that is New England.
Great QBs become great with consistency. They become comfortable in a certain system, and then things start to work from there on.
Why is it not fair? 90% of Panther fans are ready to throw Clausen to the wolves and he did not know any of the personnel, the offense, he is outside his well-oiled machine, and lastly he transitioned to the NFL.
#11
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:56 AM
3yrs into Luck we will begin our Superbowl run and become the next Dynasty
#12
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:58 AM
With Cam: 3-13
Without Cam 3-13
I dont see Cam making any difference in our record. what he makes up in our passing game he will lose due to ball secruity (have you seen the way he carries it, NFL defenders will eat that up)
#13
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:58 AM
#14
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:58 AM
#15
Posted 26 April 2011 - 09:59 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





