Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

What about Cam will revolutionize the game?

197 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

I remember this term being thrown around a lot before we drafted him. I still have really figured out what makes him so special in those terms.

Manning is like a hybrid OC/QB that's revolutionary.

Vick is one of the most mobile quarterbacks ever but he can also throw the ball, that's revolutionary.

Cam just seems like Culpepper, McNabb, Freeman, or Young(Steve and Vince) kind of QB. I can see him being very good even HoF, but I don't see how he is going to change the way football is played. Seems like he's just going to be really good.

I think his ability to extend plays and Smith's(if he stays) tenacious desire for the ball could turn into something ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I know you are bored and of course this is the worst month for sports, but do you really want to start one of these topics again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

some people think he is a better runner than Vick and could become as good a passer as Manning(edit: in time, only a few insane people think that would happen right away). I assume they also think that includes the OC bit. I think all of that is a tremendous stretch to project that for any rookie, especially one we haven't seen play all that much, but hey whatever. I think it's more likely his game follows the lines of VY or Big Ben (or the others you named before injuries etc), because I don't expect him to be able to run like he did in college, but I could be wrong.

I think that is how it went anyway; something about how his ability to move the chains with his legs and his arm would make him impossible to defend for any length of time. I think that people like Teeray who said things like that were more speaking about how quarterbacks in this league *seem* like they are moving more towards a player who can extend plays by avoiding pressure etc until they find an opening which in turn is forcing defenses to change how they play quarterbacks and how they rush them, and that if EVERYTHING went perfectly for Cam he could be the one to really push that over the edge. There are others who just think Cam Newton is the best fuging thing ever and he's already on his way to the Hall of Fame, but many more reasonable fans have reasons for thinking he will be more than just "special."

me? Well, I'm gonna wait until I see him play in the NFL. I guess that's cheating, but I've seen too many amazing college players be completely humbled in the NFL to do more than just hope he transitions as well as others believe he will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

swag

[IMG]http://chztotsandgiggles.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/funny-kids-pictures-deal-with-it.jpg[/IMG]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Udogg']I know you are bored and of course this is the worst month for sports, but do you really want to start one of these topics again?[/QUOTE]

I don't understand how these topics turn so sour in the first place. It shouldn't be that hard to discuss players without the whole discussion falling apart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='SorthNarolina']I don't understand how these topics turn so sour in the first place. It shouldn't be that hard to discuss players without the whole discussion falling apart.[/QUOTE]

it usually boils down to people making stupid claims or stupid comments about either Cam, or the other players on the roster he'll have to win the job from. It feels like any and all objectivity left whatever the 'debate' was about Cam way before he was even drafted. At this point, it all feels so stale, a lot of people have just taken to trolling each other instead of discussing because of the circles we go in over this stuff. (no offense to you for making the post, I understand how you mighta missed the only semi-decent explanation I heard for that crazy talk during the draft, and as Teeray can tell you, I still thought it was crazy at the time :P)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

How could Newton redefine the Qb position? Typically the QB in the NFL has been a drop back pure passer who was not particularly athletic or a gifted athlete. They were prized for their leadership and their ability to read defenses and throw the ball. All great characteristics and needed for the position. However, they rarely made plays with athletic ability. There have been guys in the past like Randall Cunningham, Culpeppers, Moon, and more who were black quarterbacks who were very athletic and brought elements to the position but lacked the total package. For example Cunningham was very elusive but wasn't a great passer and was injury prone being 6'5" and only 215 lbs. Vick redifined the position as a running quarterback but until last year was a good passer and didn't understand the complexity of the WCO.

What distinguished Newton as having the possibility to redefine the position is that he is very athletic and can run better than most any quarterback except for Vick. But he has the ability to throw the ball as well as most pure passers coming out of college. So he has both the running skills and the passing skills which makes him somewhat unique. He has the size of guys like Roethlisburger but is more athletic. As a result he has the possibility to redefine the position. He may not do anything but the thread is about what is special about him not whether he will in fact revolutionalize the position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What panthers55 said :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='panthers55']What distinguished Newton as havig the possibility to redefine the position is that he is very athletic and can run better than most any quarterback except for Vick. [B]But he has the ability to throw the ball as well as most pure passers coming out of college.[/B] So he has both the running skills and the passing skills which makes him somewhat unique. He has the size of guys like Roethlisburger but is much more athletic. As a result he has the possibility to redefine the position. He may not do anything but the thread is about what is special about him not whether he will in fact revolutionalize the position.[/QUOTE]

In my opinion, that is a gross overstatement of his abilities. His passing game is largely overrated based on some numbers that don't translate to how good a passer he is.

He has the chance to develop into a good passer, but at this moment, he's behind the "pure passers" as you call them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='SorthNarolina']I remember this term being thrown around a lot before we drafted him. I still have really figured out what makes him so special in those terms.

Manning is like a hybrid OC/QB that's revolutionary.

Vick is one of the most mobile quarterbacks ever but he can also throw the ball, that's revolutionary.

Cam just seems like Culpepper, McNabb, Freeman, or Young(Steve and Vince) kind of QB. I can see him being very good even HoF, but I don't see how he is going to change the way football is played. Seems like he's just going to be really good.

I think his ability to extend plays and Smith's(if he stays) tenacious desire for the ball could turn into something ridiculous.[/QUOTE]

If he can be Rothl... without the rape charges, that would be good enough for me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

He's not revolutionizing anything. But imagine Roethlisburger running like Brandon Jacobs. In college, Newton ran with speed and power, but unless the play was called for running, he was a pass-first guy.

What really made him great is what we saw from Jake in his prime. As it got toward crunch time, he got better. He found ways to make the first down, and get the ball into the end zone. He made everyone around him better, anyone watching Aurburn football could tell that the entire team believed he would get it done, and played harder for it.

So take a big, mobile, strong-armed athletic QB with great intangibles and see if he can learn the playbook and how to decipher NFL defenses. If he can, then don't worry about whether he'll revolutionize the game. Because if he can figure out how to move the ball in the NFL like he did in college, he won't [i]need[/i] to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

He's already revolutionized message boards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='TheRealDeal']In my opinion, that is a gross overstatement of his abilities. His passing game is largely overrated based on some numbers that don't translate to how good a passer he is.

He has the chance to develop into a good passer, but at this moment, he's behind the "pure passers" as you call them.[/QUOTE]

Is there a QB coming out of college in the 2010 draft or back in the 2009 draft that you can honestly say is signifcantly ahead of Cam as a passer when looking at them translating into the NFL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='MrTouchdown']He's already revolutionized message boards.[/QUOTE]

I think Vick stole his thunder on becoming an "elite" passer and runner AND on message boards.

Like others have said, I don't know if he'll revolutionize the position, but if he plays it at a high level with the gifts he's been given, he'll be fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='CRA']Is there a QB coming out of college in the 2010 draft or back in the 2009 draft that you can honestly say is signifcantly ahead of Cam as a passer when looking at them translating into the NFL?[/QUOTE]

I would say both Sanchez and Stafford were significantly ahead of Cam as a passer, but this is just my personal opinion and I expect you to form your own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='CRA']Is there a QB coming out of college in the 2010 draft or back in the 2009 draft that you can honestly say is signifcantly ahead of Cam as a passer when looking at them translating into the NFL?[/QUOTE]

Sam Bradford easy. You could argue that Jimmy Clausen was a better passer in college. Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, and Josh Freeman were all better passers.

People aren't gushing about Cam's potential because he can pass the ball. He does that well enough to get the job done, he's not a pure passer at all. What he's exceedingly good at is moving the chains. Who cares how he gets it done, as long as he gets it done at the next level?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='TheRealDeal']I would say both Sanchez and Stafford were significantly ahead of Cam as a passer, but this is just my personal opinion and I expect you to form your own.[/QUOTE]

Sanchez? really? Is he not the weakest passer in the NFL out of the big names from his draft class?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sanchez was a great passer in college. Look up his numbers--41 TDs in one year. Known for anticipation and accuracy. The knock on him was that he only started one year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Cyberjag']Sam Bradford easy. You could argue that Jimmy Clausen was a better passer in college. Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, and Josh Freeman were all better passers.

People aren't gushing about Cam's potential because he can pass the ball. He does that well enough to get the job done, he's not a pure passer at all. What he's exceedingly good at is moving the chains. Who cares how he gets it done, as long as he gets it done at the next level?[/QUOTE]

Bradford struggled to make any passes downfield his rookie year.

The question was about who was signficantly ahead of Cam as a passer heading into the NFL. Lots of QBs played in spread offense and built better stats in college....doesn't mean they are ahead.

Clausen for example, looking at him as he headed into the NFL....he had poor mechanics, height, and questionable arm strength when looking at his game transitioning to the NFL. His game was better suited for college vs. the pros. How does that put him ahead as a passer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Cyberjag']Sanchez was a great passer in college. Look up his numbers--41 TDs in one year. Known for anticipation and accuracy. The knock on him was that he only started one year.[/QUOTE]

it isn't about who was a good college player....it is about there passing skill set heading into the NFL and what the NFL asks of QBs.

Sanchez has been one of the most inaccurate and worst passers in the NFL the past 2 seasons. I mean the proof is in the pudding....Sanchez couldn't of been vastly ahead as poor as he has performed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='CRA']Bradford struggled to make any passes downfield his rookie year.

The question was about who was signficantly ahead of Cam as a passer heading into the NFL. Lots of QBs played in spread offense and built better stats in college....doesn't mean they are ahead.

Clausen for example, looking at him as he headed into the NFL....he had poor mechanics, height, and questionable arm strength when looking at his game transitioning to the NFL. His game was better suited for college vs. the pros. How does that put him ahead as a passer?[/QUOTE]

a rookie isn't going to be perfect Bradford is way ahead of any rookie from 09, 10, or 11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='SorthNarolina']a rookie isn't going to be perfect Bradford is way ahead of any rookie from 09, 10, or 11.[/QUOTE]

never implied a rookie should be perfect. Bradford struggled going downfield more so than a LOT of rookies. Don't forget the 7-9 Seahawks won that division either......Bradford IMO has been overblown as far as performance as a rookie.

Bradford isn't way ahead of Freeman, Stafford, etc. They were asked to make more difficult throws as rookies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I don't know anything about Sanchez's college career, but he is a horrible deep passer in my opinion. He has a fantastic defense to keep him in games, as well as a good running game and clutch receiver to grab his inaccurate throws. He throws short and medium passes well, but he coughs them up deep.

17 td and 13 int's last season is bad. ~55% passing. I hope to god Cam does better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='TheRealDeal']In my opinion, that is a gross overstatement of his abilities. His passing game is largely overrated based on some numbers that don't translate to how good a passer he is.

He has the chance to develop into a good passer, but at this moment, he's behind the "pure passers" as you call them.[/QUOTE]

He has been working every day to improve his passing. I don't know how far along he is from his pro day in the spring but suffice it to say he has improved. So I wouldn't call my statement a gross overstatement any more than I would call yours a biased mimimalization of his abilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think it's great that he is improving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites