then perhaps you shouldn't get pissy when I call you on your laziness.
if you call typing while doing things at home and not having copious hours to surf the net and find items to back up my claims as "debate tatics" then guilty as charged.
no, i will read the article, i will think about it, then i will respond. if you provide something obviously biased and uninformed (like the ridiculous crap SCP likes to post) then I will point that out.
Let me guess though. I go post a link and then you will make sure to link it with something conservative.
considering sources is rather important don't you think?
in your own post you 1. pass off your inability to formulate anything worth reading on what you're doing in your house and 2. take any delay from me as evidence that i'm simply stealing my ideas off google. wow, that's an amazing new height of cognitive dissonance.
And the time it took for you to pass off your retort as something of your own is about the time it would take to google just enough to respond.
Talk about sham.
if you must know, I've been reading this article on and off all night, and find it far more entertaining than dragging you around.
it's pretty dense so i have to give it a lot of focus and reread sections
oh yeah okay let me get right on that.
I mean you really want to jump in to the big boy seat we can just have a debate that is taped and its either what you know or not. We can give proceeds to Toys for Tots.
No search engine to hide behind. No looking at the bookshelf of Books a Million while you type.
well you certainly haven't shown you are besides repeating the fact that you're reading a soros book which you freely admitt isn't related to the issue at hand, which is apparently his support of anti americanism and terrorist lawyer defenders, which of course you haven't provided any evidence of.
Keep in mind I am CURRENTLY reading a George Soros book. Now think about that. You are trying to challenge me on this guy, you try to paint a picture of me as a Time reader(lazy mans informer to some degree) as if I'm not on the ball.
the only person i've ever seen you reference, besides this mythical soros book, is thomas friedman, who is the criticism you levied against Time magazine down to a T. if you started posting kathryn jean lopez or bill kristol, then i'd call you on that as well. however, you strike me as the kind of guy that prefers the bland, centrist, relatively uneducated types that are easy to read.
lol again this is great.
So I can quote something and it will NOT be google worthy. That can make your responses very difficult when it comes time to cut and paste.
i take time with my responses. things like links, grammar, spacing.
what the f*ck does this even mean
I don't respond to threads to reconfirm my worth in this world. :svengo:
you honest to god are either functionally retarded or terrible at synthesizing your thoughts into something readable
Edited by Fiz, 01 March 2009 - 10:30 PM.