Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

PLAYERS REJECT DEAL: Breaking


  • Please log in to reply
101 replies to this topic

#61 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,450 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:06 PM

Im going to kill someone in the next 15 minutes if no one gives me a god damn link!


nfl.com says owners approved 31-0. Players haven't voted yet.

#62 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,515 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:06 PM

Of course they rejected it. Do you think the beat reporter just made up that Richardson quote? It wasn't a formal vote though.


How can you reject something you haven't voted on?

#63 Sam Mills Fan

Sam Mills Fan

    The Truth Sometimes Hurts

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,746 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:08 PM

How am I making poo up? If it's not accurate, blame the USA Today guy. That's a legit reporter and that's his legit Twitter account. He said they rejected the deal and that's what I posted.

#64 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,470 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:08 PM

How can you reject something you haven't voted on?


Because some people here just want attention... Even if it means making things up to get it.

#65 KillerKat

KillerKat

    Top Banana

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,859 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:09 PM

so what the fug is the truth! did they or did they not fuging reject the mother fuging deal!???

#66 Panthercougar68

Panthercougar68

    The Nice

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,702 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:09 PM



#67 Sam Mills Fan

Sam Mills Fan

    The Truth Sometimes Hurts

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,746 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:09 PM

How can you reject something you haven't voted on?


I have no idea. Just posting what the guy said. Again, if it's not accurate, you can't blame me for posting what a respected USA Today reporter was officially reporting.

#68 boney

boney

    teh pwnthers ftmfw

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 542 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:10 PM

How am I making poo up? If it's not accurate, blame the USA Today guy. That's a legit reporter and that's his legit Twitter account. He said they rejected the deal and that's what I posted.


he just corrected himself:

#NFLPA has not voted to reject or approve the deal. They're on conference call now. Stay tuned.



#69 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,450 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:10 PM

so what the fug is the truth! did they or did they not fuging reject the mother fuging deal!???


THey haven't voted on it yet.

Players still had to sign off on the deal -- and they must re-establish their union, the NFL said. Players didn't vote on a full pact Wednesday because there were issues that hadn't been resolved. Sources told both Jay Glazer of NFL Network and Fox Sports and NFL Network insider Jason La Canfora that players won't vote on Thursday, though a players conference call is ongoing to discuss the proposal.



#70 jasonluckydog

jasonluckydog

    Never go full retard

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,645 posts
  • LocationGATOR CREEK- SC

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:10 PM

GAlexander21 Gerald Alexander
RT @jasonluckydog: @GAlexander21 are you voting? yes or no? <--I'm making Spaghetti right now
21 Jul Favorite Retweet Reply

#71 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,470 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:11 PM

so what the fug is the truth! did they or did they not fuging reject the mother fuging deal!???


They 100% have NOT voted and probably won't vote until Monday at the earliest IMO

#72 YoungPanthers89

YoungPanthers89

    Lucy Snorebush

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,835 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:11 PM

Posted Image

#73 Carolina Mike II

Carolina Mike II

    Was Just Carolina Mike!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:11 PM

"Serious" "100%" and "Evidence" words should be banned from being used in any title of threads UNLESS you are Seriously 100% sure with Evidence of what you are saying is actually and factually correct!

#74 Sam Mills Fan

Sam Mills Fan

    The Truth Sometimes Hurts

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,746 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:11 PM

he just corrected himself:


Well there you go. Jesus you people...

#75 Sam Mills Fan

Sam Mills Fan

    The Truth Sometimes Hurts

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,746 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:12 PM

"Serious" "100%" and "Evidence" words should be banned from being used in any title of threads UNLESS you are Seriously 100% sure with Evidence of what you are saying is actually and factually correct!


None of those words were in the thread title.....


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.