Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Murph

Democrats...*sigh*

Recommended Posts

I'm no Bush fan. Every time he got in front of a podium I cringed because he butchered the language. But I knew that this guy was the wrong way to turn. And the people who actually make this country work aren't going to sit by while he takes from them to subsidize those who refuse to work.

EZ there Mr. Meat...I'm not a fan of either Bush or Obama so don't come at me like I'm some Obamanaut on another anti-Bush rant. I just think it's a joke for either side to blame the other. They're equally responsible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Once we get most in the tinderbox to admit that Obama and Bush are basically the same person, we'll be finally getting somewhere...

How are they the same person?? Obama basically reversed every policy Bush had set in.. I just don't see how you can make that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Americans killed in wars started by Bush = 4000 +

if i remember correctly, they hit us first.

stop trying to defend obama. you cant. the guy is royaly fuging up this country and you know it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bush takes over budget surplus and great economy

Obama takes over huge deficit and terrible economy

the economy was excellent during bush's first 6 years. however, back in 2006 when the dems took control of the government, it all started going downhill, largely in part to democrat senators dropping the ball on the whole freddie mac/fannie mae scandal. yea bush's spending was out of control, but it doesn't help when you've tripled the national debt in less than 6 weeks.

on a side note, bush had generated 20% more revenue during his tenure than bill clinton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nevermind that republicans are getting more earmark money per senator than the dems.

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nevermind that republicans are getting more earmark money per senator than the dems.

lol

Would that have anything to do with there being more Dems than Reps ?:mad2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would that have anything to do with there being more Dems than Reps ?:mad2:

Uh, no.

Wouldn't you think the party that is kicking and screaming over earmarks would have much less of a piece of the pie adjusted for senate membership?

Turns out they are more on the take than the dems.

Everyone sucks.

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then wouldn't that give the Dems even more justification to vote against it especially taking into consideration the promisies made by their president?

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then why did over 2/3 of them vote against it but only 2 Dems?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Pubs were to get more of the earmarks, then why did over 2/3 of them vote against it but only 2 Dems?

Because they know the dems will pass it. This way they can have their cake and eat it too. 1. Get money from taxpayers to help their states 2. Look conservative for voting against the money they are taking.

And people are buying all this BS?

sad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they know the dems will pass it. This way they can have their cake and eat it too. 1. Get money from taxpayers to help their states 2. Look conservative for voting against the money they are taking.

And people are buying all this BS?

sad

Dude, why oh why oh why did Obama put the fate of his presidency in the hands of Pelosi and Reid? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Bottom line...McCain promised to get rid of earmarks (he's been a huge proponent of doing so for years), and Obama knew he had to do the same to get elected. Now we're seeing he was less than truthful about it. What did Colbert call it? Truthiness?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Obama has a choice on who the senior members of Congress are.

I didn't expect immediate earmark gratification - we will see if there is a marked decrease in this stuff over his 4 year term. Even this year with no bickering, earmarks are down 5 percent I understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Obama has a choice on who the senior members of Congress are.

I didn't expect immediate earmark gratification - we will see if there is a marked decrease in this stuff over his 4 year term. Even this year with no bickering, earmarks are down 5 percent I understand.

The stock market's down a lot more than that. Those are the people who know what's up. Not the little dipshit economics professor wearing a bowtie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you fully expect Obama to reverse the course this country is on in a mere 6 weeks? Oh, that's right, the Dow was at 14,000 on January 20 this year. I must have forgotten. He caused it all. Meat, please accept my sincere non-apology.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you fully expect Obama to reverse the course this country is on in a mere 6 weeks? Oh, that's right, the Dow was at 14,000 on January 20 this year. I must have forgotten. He caused it all. Meat, please accept my sincere non-apology.

Um, okay....Weirdo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×