Posted 03 August 2011 - 04:38 PM
I wonder, if we go back, say about 2 months before the draft, and count who has the most posts in Cam threads... Who would it be?
I wonder if their rage posting rate is convincing anyone to buy into their argument? Yet they keep spewing the same thing like it's new. We understand. You don't like him. You think he's going to fail. We've read it 2,000,000 times over.
Let me try:
Poster #1: Cam is gonna be good.
Rage Overkill SSDD Poster: No he's not! He's sucks. He's the exact opposite of everything you said. He is the pigmented spawn of satan! I've come up with proof! He's horrible. He sucks! He will not be good! You will see! Trust me, I know football! He's not good! Why am I still doing this? Who likes this? Am I really a fan of this team? Aww, anyway, he sucks! He can't throw! 99.302948293230447% of his throws were behind the LOS, so they don't count! RAWR! Rage rage rage fap fap fap fap fap.
Isn't a troll's role to derail threads with irrelevant discussion? Well, good job. Because everytime this happens it immediately stops being an objective conversation... It divides people up into "Cam huggers" and "Cam haters," and no one can state anything objective because they're too busy trying to show how good or how bad they think he is to disprove the bullsh*t statements.
This place is going to sh*t.