Did You Actually Want Cam Drafted?
#1
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:48 PM
Anyways, personally I had Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert over Cam and was hoping that we took one of them instead of Cam. Now Jake Locker will have a few years to develop behind Matt Hasselbeck and Blaine Gabbert will have time to work under David Garrard. I image both of those rookies I had over Cam will have better starting careers then Cam, at least when you compare Cam starting his first season and Blaine/Jake getting time to wait.
So, what you think? Who should we have drafted instead of Cam, or do you agree that drafting Cam was a smart decision? Or possibly, should we have went for another position?
#2
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:50 PM
#3
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:52 PM
#4
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:53 PM
#6
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:53 PM
#7
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:53 PM
#8
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:54 PM
If Luck didn't declare I wanted Cam.
With the new rookie scale, it makes it a fantastic gamble.
#9
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:54 PM
I wanted Green, Dareus, Peterson #1.
Ideally I wanted them to trade away that pick for more picks, but that wasn't going to happen.
#10
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:54 PM
But then I thought about it NO FOXY ANYMORE! OR DAVIDSON! Chico will rise this team up once again!
#11
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:55 PM
#12
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:55 PM
Once Luck returned to school, there wasn't any QB worth taking #1. Not even Cam.
I wanted Green, Dareus, Peterson #1.
Ideally I wanted them to trade away that pick for more picks, but that wasn't going to happen.
pretty much this
#13
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:56 PM
Simply really, how many of you actually wanted Cam drafted with the 1st pick? Not jumping aboard when Andrew Luck announced he wasn't going into the draft, or when we actually drafted him. Did you even want a QB? Maybe we could have traded down, got a DT and possibly got Andy Dalton? I dunno, just wondering.
Anyways, personally I had Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert over Cam and was hoping that we took one of them instead of Cam. Now Jake Locker will have a few years to develop behind Matt Hasselbeck and Blaine Gabbert will have time to work under David Garrard. I image both of those rookies I had over Cam will have better starting careers then Cam, at least when you compare Cam starting his first season and Blaine/Jake getting time to wait.
So, what you think? Who should we have drafted instead of Cam, or do you agree that drafting Cam was a smart decision? Or possibly, should we have went for another position?
make it a poll
#14
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:56 PM
#15
Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:57 PM
I NEVER wanted Gabbert or Fairley.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






