Stem cell funding ban to be lifted
#1
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:43 PM
#2
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:46 PM
#3
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:48 PM
#4
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:49 PM
#5
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:53 PM
#6
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:54 PM
why not use them? It has the potential to cure many ailments. otherwise (as bas as it sounds) its trashed.
Because it would legitimize abortions.
#7
Posted 06 March 2009 - 04:58 PM
#8
Posted 06 March 2009 - 06:14 PM
Because it would legitimize abortions.
Well maybe not so much morally legit, but being legal, its already legitimized, wheter anyone likes it or not.
#9
Posted 06 March 2009 - 06:15 PM
Because it would legitimize abortions.
it has nothing to do with abortions. they are left over from in-vitro fertilizations. if they aren't used for research, they are thrown away.
#10
Posted 06 March 2009 - 06:26 PM
#11
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:55 AM
it has nothing to do with abortions. they are left over from in-vitro fertilizations. if they aren't used for research, they are thrown away.
Would you advocate using the terminally ill for medical research that may hasten their deaths -- because, hey, they're gonna die anyway?
btw -- Clinton signed the bill forbidding federal funding for medical research involving the creation or destruction of human embryos. Bush was the one who lifted the ban for embryonic stem cell research, but only on the existing lines.
#12
Posted 10 March 2009 - 08:57 AM
Would you advocate using the terminally ill for medical research that may hasten their deaths -- because, hey, they're gonna die anyway?
I'm still trying to figure out how that relates to rodeo's comment.:confused:
#13
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:46 AM
I've got a simple, possibly dumb question. When multiple embryos are created during invitro and not all are implanted, what happens to the excess if the parents choose not to save them for the future? Do they have to sign a bunch of papers turning the rights of them over the clinic? What does the clinic do with them on average?
They throw them in the garbage can. Which is why it's absolutely ridiculous that anyone could be against the idea of using them for medical research.
#14
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:49 AM
#15
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:55 AM
I'm still trying to figure out how that relates to rodeo's comment.:confused:
it doesn't, not even a little bit.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





