Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Stem cell funding ban to be lifted

15 posts in this topic

Posted

I know the story says it correctly, but your title implies there is a stem cell ban. There is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

why not use them? It has the potential to cure many ailments. otherwise (as bas as it sounds) its trashed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yeah, I guess "funding" after "cell" should be in the title.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I thought it said stem cell fondue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

why not use them? It has the potential to cure many ailments. otherwise (as bas as it sounds) its trashed.

Because it would legitimize abortions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I've got a simple, possibly dumb question. When multiple embryos are created during invitro and not all are implanted, what happens to the excess if the parents choose not to save them for the future? Do they have to sign a bunch of papers turning the rights of them over the clinic? What does the clinic do with them on average?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Because it would legitimize abortions.

Well maybe not so much morally legit, but being legal, its already legitimized, wheter anyone likes it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Because it would legitimize abortions.

it has nothing to do with abortions. they are left over from in-vitro fertilizations. if they aren't used for research, they are thrown away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I understand what this is about. My point was, then there would be people who would say, here is a whole other source for more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it has nothing to do with abortions. they are left over from in-vitro fertilizations. if they aren't used for research, they are thrown away.

Would you advocate using the terminally ill for medical research that may hasten their deaths -- because, hey, they're gonna die anyway?

btw -- Clinton signed the bill forbidding federal funding for medical research involving the creation or destruction of human embryos. Bush was the one who lifted the ban for embryonic stem cell research, but only on the existing lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Would you advocate using the terminally ill for medical research that may hasten their deaths -- because, hey, they're gonna die anyway?

I'm still trying to figure out how that relates to rodeo's comment.:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites