Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Htar

On sports reporters this morning

42 posts in this topic

unc will be the overall #1 seed barring a 2nd round upset in the acc tourney

Agreed, they will seal it by getting to the ACC championship game. Don't even have to win it and they have the number one overall. I just want them to win it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you are #1 in the nation doesn't mean you will get a #1 seed.

Has it ever happened that the current number one didn't get a top seed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really want that rematch...Some unfinished business there.

And I want a rematch with with either Virginia Tech or Miami since they are only two teams in the ACC this year that we did not defeat. So I will be pulling for one of them Friday. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the number one seed should be based on a season's work, not the outcome of a tournament where you have a bunch of desperate teams trying to get into the dance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UNC will get a one seed regardless of what happens in the ACC tourney. Memphis should NOT get a one seed...I think Oklahoma deserves a one seed before Memphis. Hell, I'd give Louisville a number 1 before Memphis. Memphis plays in a poo conference and their OOC schedule wasn't nearly as tough as their OOC schedule from last year. As for Oklahoma I think 2 of their losses came with Blake Griffen on the bench.

My prediction for the one seeds are UNC, UConn, Pitt, Oklahoma

The team I'm most worried about playing is Pitt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 seeds

UNC, Memphis (give them a 1 seed, i think they earned it), Pitt, Louisville

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The #1 should be UNC, UConn, Pitt and MEM. LOU shouldnt get one. That being said UNC wont make the final 4 this year and the Big East could have 3 in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has it ever happened that the current number one didn't get a top seed?

Highly doubt it, i'm just saying that the rankings don't mean anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the number one seed should be based on a season's work, not the outcome of a tournament where you have a bunch of desperate teams trying to get into the dance.

So what if Wake goes on a run and beats Duke and UNC en route to winning the ACC tournament? Do they not get consideration for a #1 seed (of course not THE #1 overall seed)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the number one seed should be based on a season's work, not the outcome of a tournament where you have a bunch of desperate teams trying to get into the dance.

No

Share this post


Link to post

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined