Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Was it wrong when James Carville said

43 posts in this topic

Posted

Once Stalin got his hands on it.

Yes yes Fiz, we get that theoretically once the proletariat grasps the concept of how much better a society of equals is, that no government, police force, or even military should be necessary.

All the garbage he espouses in the Manifesto.

But human nature led to the fall of, in this case, the USSR.

Government corruption is just a different kind of corruption than the corporate variant.

The communist dream is a joke, can't be achieved as long as human beings want more and crave power/money, and no amount of political indoctrination will EVER remove that.

Ergo, no communist system will last much longer than the evil plutocracy they despise so much that it replaced.

Bang, crunch, bang, crunch.

As to the Utopia collapse, I meant it as a Utopia for the adherents to the political philosophy, not those of us that believe it to be more likely just a different kind of hell. Therefore not a true Utopia, therefore still subject to destruction.

A slightly more miserable human condition than it's political opposite.

Greed....it's a wonderful thing. It helped get us to the top of the evolutionary ladder and then we're supposed to just turn it off....gimme your sammich, beyotch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Greed....it's a wonderful thing. It helped get us to the top of the evolutionary ladder and then we're supposed to just turn it off....gimme your sammich, beyotch.

As usual, you said it better, shorter, and funnier than I did.

jerk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Once Stalin got his hands on it.

As to the Utopia collapse, I meant it as a Utopia for the adherents to the political philosophy

do you think leninst russia was a pure marxist state cause uh i have news for you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Of course not, I'm not an idiot.

But if you think it wasn't considered the template for the closest thing we have HAD thus far to his system in implementation rather than just in theory, then uh i have news for you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

But if you think it wasn't considered the template for the closest thing we have HAD thus far to his system in implementation rather than just in theory, then uh i have news for you

that'd actually probably be calvinist geneva

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't you think that burg was a bit to Bible-y to be classified amongst the marxists?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Don't you think that burg was a bit to Bible-y to be classified amongst the marxists?

replace belief/fear in god with general desire to better humanity and it's the same thing

actually religious communities offer very good structural examples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yes, both equally toxic and misguided. ;)

I think that's a reach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think that's a reach.

the base word of communism isn't a mistake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe you are right.

Calvin murdered people too, just like Stalin.

A community united in faith seems different to me than a community united in the secular betterment of all, since the ultimate focus is not nearly the same. Some of the tools, yes. Not the goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Actually, I believe he said it on 9/11 ... just before the attacks were reported.

That's what I was referring to, but wasn't very clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

are you trying to defend rush by creating an equivalency between him and james carville because uh

Rush never actually said he wanted Obama to fail. so, uh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites