Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Uh...what Mr. President?

197 posts in this topic

you're no stranger to straw men

When you take a piss, the word irony must spontaneously form out of the foam in the bowl.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

after you take a piss, you demand the long form proof that that piss actually came from your body, or if it was placed in the bowl by the illuminati

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

after you take a piss, you demand the long form proof that that piss actually came from your body, or if it was placed in the bowl by the illuminati

:lol:

That's actually funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's actually the point. A stutter/slip/whatever doesn't really deserve any more than a confused look, if that. However, we know a White Christian Racist Devil wouldn't get such common sense treatment.

This is the first issue. You made a pretty big truth claim (indicated by "we know") and have nothing to back it up (other than a few studies). You can find all the articles and studies you want, but to say something conclusively exists, you must have irrefutable evidence. Considering Fox News is pretty far right-leaning, to say that "media is liberal biased" is inaccurate, as you did not quantify it with "some." By not quantifying it, it is to be read that you think ALL media is liberal biased. Then, after all this, you ask Cantrell which side has more racists (or something to that effect) and continuously beg him to answer it, as if you have some grand point to make. It is an unanswerable question, as it is hard to know exactly how many of every kind of people are REALLY racist. Furthermore, it has nothing to do with the conversation. Finally, it is a feeble attempt at a straw-man.

Somebody sucks at recognizing a logical fallacy. Not to say any names, Blackcatgrowl, but I'm just sayin', bro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have nothing to back it up (other than a few studies).

:lol:

So is that something? Or is it nothing?

Uh... ya... I'll take UCLA's political science research study as evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in case anyone is wondering, blackcatgrowl's ucla study identified the drudge report as a left leaning media outlet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in case anyone is wondering, blackcatgrowl's ucla study identified the drudge report as a left leaning media outlet

You identify Obama as a Republican, what's the problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

So is that something? Or is it nothing?

Uh... ya... I'll take UCLA's political science research study as evidence.

Ever heard of argument from authority or popular appeal, jackass? That is what you are doing.

And who'da thunk it? TWO logical fallacies in ONE post by BCG!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You identify Obama as a Republican, what's the problem?

obama's policy is that of a 1990s republican, yes. most people who can look beyond the color of his skin and the D beside his name would agree

your study is fuged if it considers drudge "left leaning" but let's face it, you just googled "liberal media bias study" and posted whatever the fug came up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

obama's policy is that of a 1990s republican, yes. most people who can look beyond the color of his skin and the D beside his name would agree

your study is fuged if it considers drudge "left leaning" but let's face it, you just googled "liberal media bias study" and posted whatever the fug came up

Again...looking for "evidence" that supports your argument while ignoring all "evidence" to the contrary as lies, corruption, etc. is yet another logical fallacy.

Assuming you did this, BCG, you are really out-doing yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever heard of argument from authority or popular appeal, jackass? That is what you are doing.

And who'da thunk it? TWO logical fallacies in ONE post by BCG!

The reason I'm not going to sit here and post "evidence", is because we have been ALL over that many times before here. I'm not going to necro a thread, or produce a work of research paper when it is readily available for you to search for, and has been researched by professionals already. It's also a point of common sense to me as well... just turn on CNN and watch it for an hour or two. That should be evidence enough.

If you're curious or are really interested in the discussion follow this link.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=admits+media+bias&aq=f

Watch the plethora of videos, and come to your own conclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nah dude fug that youtube link just go by the study that says the drudge report leans left.

free republic must be centrist and stormfront must be center right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites