Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SCP

Serious question for Obama voters

95 posts in this topic

I believe your utility bill fear is a little unwarranted....I think in the next 5 years you'll see solar panels on peoples houses and allowing them to contribute back to the grid.

I hope you're right, though I have to say I'm rightfully skeptical when he is steadfastly opposed to us building more nuclear power plants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one area where I disagree with the guy I voted for. Nuclear power is a well established and well regulated form of power generation. Not to mention a safe one as well. Sure, it takes much longer to erect a nuclear plant than it does to install a solar panel or wind turbine, but the comparative power generation capabilities are much greater. If only they would invest more heavily in that pesky waste storage problem...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one area where I disagree with the guy I voted for. Nuclear power is a well established and well regulated form of power generation. Not to mention a safe one as well. Sure, it takes much longer to erect a nuclear plant than it does to install a solar panel or wind turbine, but the comparative power generation capabilities are much greater. If only they would invest more heavily in that pesky waste storage problem...

We could wean ourselves off of oil much more quickly with nuclear power than any other alternative source.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. We finally see eye to eye on something. What progress!:hurray:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. We finally see eye to eye on something. What progress!:hurray:

If I can change...and youze can change....everybody can change!

We need a Rocky smiley.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, just reviewed the Leno interview and it struck me that in order for plug-in hybrids to be part of a solution, the electricity absolutely must be generated by nuclear power plants. Otherwise, they contribute to the already growing dependency issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, just reviewed the Leno interview and it struck me that in order for plug-in hybrids to be part of a solution, the electricity absolutely must be generated by nuclear power plants. Otherwise, they contribute to the already growing dependency issue.

I was thinking the same thing when he said that.

But I don't necessarily agree with the nuclear thing though. Our power consumption is rising(which is not really a bad thing - it's a mark of progress in general) and I think it'll take a lot of smaller innovations to keep up, not just simply building more plants.

The concept of people selling back to the grid is very powerful. Just think of all the ways individuals could create power given they have incentive. Solar power is just one thing, but think someone exercising on a bike - they afford to buy a more expensive bike that'll generate a current and sell it back to the grid because ultimately they'll make a profit. Now take that concept to ever growing health clubs....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But I don't necessarily agree with the nuclear thing though.

I understand that selling power back to the grid is an attractive thought, though who is going to make the initial investment to follow through with that? It would have to be *heavily* subsidized and not a very consistent source of power. I would rather spend my tax dollars on nuclear energy, which produces large quantities of electricity at a consistent, dependable rate.

What problems do you currently have with nuclear power? Why the reservations about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that selling power back to the grid is an attractive thought, though who is going to make the initial investment to follow through with that? It would have to be *heavily* subsidized and not a very consistent source of power. I would rather spend my tax dollars on nuclear energy, which produces large quantities of electricity at a consistent, dependable rate.

What problems do you currently have with nuclear power? Why the reservations about it?

I'm sure they'll say Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, and I understand that, but like McCain said, we have submarines operating all around the world that prove it can be done safely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that selling power back to the grid is an attractive thought, though who is going to make the initial investment to follow through with that? It would have to be *heavily* subsidized and not a very consistent source of power. I would rather spend my tax dollars on nuclear energy, which produces large quantities of electricity at a consistent, dependable rate.

What problems do you currently have with nuclear power? Why the reservations about it?

That's why it'll take some ingenuity to get it done. It'll take lots of smaller innovations to make it consistent and dependable.

I don't have anything against nuclear power nor am I opposed to opening new plants. I'm just trying to look at it from a bigger picture and realize that simply building new plants isn't a long term, permanent solution. If nuclear power can be used in the short term to stabilize the mess we're in I'm all for it.

Although nuclear power is safe, it's not all rainbows and lollipops.

And Meat, don't you dare call me a 'they'. :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites