Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Murph

Uh oh

Recommended Posts



I heard about this last week. I knew those were black helicopters over my house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2360777777_231f0a07b0.jpg

^^^ Obvious symbol of terrorism

Didn't you have that as an avatar Jase? I got my eye on you....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the Missouri Department of Homeland Security, which was created by communists.

Actually, it's the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ... and yes, I read that this initiative has been in operation for several years. I also read that Napolitano thinks it's a fabulous idea and will keep it going. She's the one, though, who does not acknowledge "terrorists."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it's the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ... and yes, I read that this initiative has been in operation for several years. I also read that Napolitano thinks it's a fabulous idea and will keep it going. She's the one, though, who does not acknowledge "terrorists."

If we can't call them terrorists, can we call them Fizzies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<< Oh noes it's bak!!! (Couldn't find the grayed out version.)

When they black bag me I want you all to know... epi was my favorite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

constitution's about to burst into flames lol

constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.

The supreme court completely shot down that assumption last year and gave an interpretation of the 2nd amendment means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

who cares what a bunch of activist judges say

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.

no, the US Constitution states:" A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

YOU can translate the second amendment that way, or any way you like..regardless... the Supreme Court currently sees things a little bit differently, as it has left the overall translation to each state- each state may be as restrictive as it wishes regarding the regulation of firearms- and currently, I can legally own weapons in our state, militia or no militia.

and honestly, I'm not worried about the 2nd Amendment nearly as much as the GIVE Act.....:puke::leaving:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,299
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    kfcomber51
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      140,466
    • Total Posts
      4,471,631
×