Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Federal court blocks intrusive North Carolina abortion law


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

#1 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,539 posts

Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:17 PM

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked part of new North Carolina law that requires abortion providers to show women an ultrasound and describe the images in detail four hours before having an abortion. The law also requires doctors to offer women the chance to listen to the heartbeat of the fetus.

The new law was set to take effect on Wednesday, but U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles stopped it from being implemented until she can hear further arguments.

A coalition of groups filed a lawsuit in late September challenging the constitutionality of the law.

North Carolina lawmakers argued the law would protect women from the emotional distress caused by having an abortion by persuading them to give birth, but the judge was not convinced.


http://www.rawstory....a-abortion-law/

North Carolina is slowly taking over from South Carolina as the state with the dumbest lawmakers.

I'm not arguing abortion. I'm just saying how dumb the rednecks are that run this state.

At least our unemployment rate is super...

#2 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,798 posts

Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:46 PM

our taxes are high, unemployment is high but hey!!!!! let's make laws that will get struck down by common sense. morons

#3 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,136 posts

Posted 25 October 2011 - 10:13 PM

On March 10, 2010 President Barack Obama nominated Eagles to a seat in the Middle District of North Carolina that came open when N. Carlton Tilley assumed senior status. Eagles had a hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 16, 2010 and her nomination was reported to the full Senate on May 6, 2010. The Senate approved her nomination on December 16, 2010, during the lame duck session of the 111th Congress.


...

#4 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,798 posts

Posted 25 October 2011 - 10:16 PM

Is she creating jobs and cutting taxes in NC? I'm confused.

#5 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,136 posts

Posted 25 October 2011 - 10:20 PM

No...just doing her job. Stopping state legislation from the federal bench.

#6 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,743 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 01:38 PM

North Carolina lawmakers argued the law would protect women from the emotional distress caused by having an abortion by persuading them to give birth


Logic G5 can get behind.

#7 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 04:45 PM

hey g5, do you support this legislation because you feel it's "right" or do you support this legislation because your team does?

#8 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,743 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 07:58 PM

He wants more welfare babies that grow up to need to be drug tested.

#9 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,136 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:17 PM

hey g5, do you support this legislation because you feel it's "right" or do you support this legislation because your team does?


I support providing women to make informed choices. You know...the same women that can't figure out how to use proper birth control.

#10 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:22 PM

I support providing women to make informed choices. You know...the same women that can't figure out how to use proper birth control.


...new North Carolina law that requires abortion providers to show women an ultrasound and describe the images in detail four hours before having an abortion. The law also requires doctors to offer women the chance to listen to the heartbeat of the fetus.


yes this sounds totally necessary

#11 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,136 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:24 PM

My response not suffice? What part of the legislation has you upset.

#12 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,798 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:27 PM

...

Edited by GaziVicious, 26 October 2011 - 08:35 PM.


#13 cantrell

cantrell

    secular progressive bogeyman

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,447 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:29 PM

it's funny how you think a woman who wants an abortion must not have a clue as to what that thing inside of her is

#14 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,743 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:32 PM

I thought it was a Cadillac because thats what I hear all the welfare mothers get

#15 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,136 posts

Posted 28 October 2011 - 06:55 AM

any government oversight that prevents this and puts makes the event a less flippant act...the better.

http://www.reuters.c...E79Q7GK20111027


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.