Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Midseason 2012 Mock Draft


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 CAPantherFan

CAPantherFan

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 351 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:34 PM

Mods will probably move this but we suck so why not enjoy a mid season stab at a mock...

http://msn.foxsports...ck-Draft-111411

#2 Panther53521

Panther53521

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 761 posts
  • LocationHickory, NC

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:39 PM

no way we take a DE with Matt Kalil on the board

#3 cbarrier90

cbarrier90

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,472 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:39 PM

Hurney better not be taking anyone else if, as the mock suggests, Matt Kalil is available.

#4 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,739 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:41 PM

another DE... my god, no one actually pays attention to us do they?

the reasoning behind that pick? Beason and Davis went down... so we need another DE opposite charles Johnson...

they don't know about hardy

#5 nctarheel0619

nctarheel0619

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,093 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:55 PM

I'm a big Heel fan. I would understand the pick if they moved Cope to DT. But, honestly, he hasn't done much at DE this year. So..........this pick wouldn't make any sense at all.

#6 TheRealDeal

TheRealDeal

    Senior Member

  • TROLLOLOL
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,418 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:56 PM

We have the #2 pick right now

#7 Panther53521

Panther53521

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 761 posts
  • LocationHickory, NC

Posted 15 November 2011 - 03:58 PM

If we are top 5 pick ... It will be an excellent chance for us to trade back and pick up extra picks

#8 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,739 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:00 PM

for shear luxury, I want justin blackmon. my god, that would be a dangerous offense.

yes i know WR isn't our biggest need by a long shot, but i can dream can't I?

#9 Firefox

Firefox

    This Board Rocks

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 733 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:00 PM

We have the #2 pick right now


Yep

http://www.gbnreport...draftorder.html

#10 TheRealDeal

TheRealDeal

    Senior Member

  • TROLLOLOL
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,418 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:01 PM

If we are top 5 pick ... It will be an excellent chance for us to trade back and pick up extra picks


Why trade down to get more average players when we can have an impact player at the top, in theory?

#11 TheRealDeal

TheRealDeal

    Senior Member

  • TROLLOLOL
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,418 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:02 PM

Yep

http://www.gbnreport...draftorder.html


I know, it's been posted in the correct forum, the NFL forum with some predictions on outcomes as well.

http://www.carolinah...the-1-pick.html

#12 Firefox

Firefox

    This Board Rocks

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 733 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:04 PM

I never understood wanting to have a bunch of draft picks.

For every college player you take a chance on you have to cut a veteran NFL player. Roster size is a finite number.

#13 Swarly

Swarly

    MichaelJordanLaughing.gif

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,221 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:05 PM

Why trade down to get more average players when we can have an impact player at the top, in theory?


This is my problem with trading down. I'd much rather have a blue chip player than drop down too far and just get a marginal player. Yes I'm aware you can get great players late(Beason/Kalil for example), but it's a lot harder to find those guys late in the first.

Although if we end up picking #2(VERY likely IMO), we could probably trade down just a few spots and get very good compensation. Redskins, Chiefs, Dolphins, and maybe even the Seahawks will all be wanting quarterbacks and will all be picking high enough to trade down without passing up on significant talent.

#14 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,900 posts
  • LocationRound about here

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:07 PM

Yeah, I'm sure Sam Bradford would love to know he will be beaten to a pulp yet again due to a sorry OL. But its OK Sam you can have a rookie WR to heave the ball to in those few times you get a clean look.

Kalil to the Rams if he is still on the board. Basic rule of thumb. #1 - get a franchise QB; #2 - get him protection; #3 - get him weapons. Rams need to address #2 first.

#15 TheRealDeal

TheRealDeal

    Senior Member

  • TROLLOLOL
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,418 posts

Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:09 PM

True, but there will be roughly 4 QBs up for grabs early, possibly more (even though only 2 should be). Colts may or may not take Luck depending on Peyton. Redskins and Seahawks must take QBs. With that, they can still all get what they want and who they want. Not sure how much trading is going to go on considering who took QBs last year.

Who knows, there is a lot of football left. We are currently #2 in the race for #1.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com