Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Postal Service reports massive $5 billion loss


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
109 replies to this topic

#76 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,407
  • Reputation: 2,159
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 08:55 AM

wonder if we had this much whining with the light bulb and electricity were invented?

"oh no, the candle makers might have their lives disrupted" Hey, it is progress and change and you have to roll with it.

#77 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • Joined: 22-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,247
  • Reputation: 4,031
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 08:58 AM

automobile manufacturers put the poor cart manufacturers out of business :(

#78 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,107
  • Reputation: 612
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:06 AM

It's not so much the jobs that would be lost only. The whole system just isn't cost-efficient anymore and yet certain basic aspects of it are still needed. Even if you cut a ton of postal workers you're still in a situation where the number of workers required to do even the basics costs more than the money that's coming in.

#79 Carolina Husker

Carolina Husker

    I hate football

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,537
  • Reputation: 394
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:21 AM

Yet another reason for us all to come together in our hatred of old people.

#80 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 6,463
  • Reputation: 1,250
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:27 AM

So if you're going to advocate scrapping the USPS and moving to electronic communication answer a couple of questions for me.

How are you going to guarantee that every home and every office has a permanent email address? 1313mockingbirdlanenowherenc27405@usps.gov? Remember, the address has to be divorced from the person residing or working there so you cant rely on the public to set it up. It will have to be a government supplied address.

How are you going to ensure that at least one person at that address has an electronic device capable of retrieving and sending mail through this new system? Government supplied tablets? And how to you keep them from being taken off site and robbing that address of the ability to get mail?

Electronic communication has come a very long way in a short period of time but its not the answer yet. Maybe some of the children being born today will see the USPS cease to exist but most of the folks old enough to post on this forum will die before the USPS does.




Cut the delivery days to 3 and charge $0.005/pc more for bulk mail.

#81 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • Joined: 02-December 08
  • posts: 5,590
  • Reputation: 173
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:36 AM

So if you're going to advocate scrapping the USPS and moving to electronic communication answer a couple of questions for me.

How are you going to guarantee that every home and every office has a permanent email address? 1313mockingbirdlanenowherenc27405@usps.gov? Remember, the address has to be divorced from the person residing or working there so you cant rely on the public to set it up. It will have to be a government supplied address.

How are you going to ensure that at least one person at that address has an electronic device capable of retrieving and sending mail through this new system? Government supplied tablets? And how to you keep them from being taken off site and robbing that address of the ability to get mail?

Electronic communication has come a very long way in a short period of time but its not the answer yet. Maybe some of the children being born today will see the USPS cease to exist but most of the folks old enough to post on this forum will die before the USPS does.




Cut the delivery days to 3 and charge $0.005/pc more for bulk mail.


That's what it will take, but that will cost delivery man jobs and the union has so far resisted that type of movement.

#82 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,407
  • Reputation: 2,159
HUDDLER

Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:45 AM

Require that the USPS charge what it actually costs. The free market will have folks moving to better systems immediately. Many many entrepenuers will spring up to fill the gap. Problem will take care of itself.

#83 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,746
  • Reputation: 8,754
HUDDLER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 10:44 AM

Bump


They've lost $15B+ this year alone...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/49992517


The head of the financially struggling U.S. Postal Service said the agency must be allowed to ease the terms of prepayments into a retiree health-care fund and eliminate general mail delivery on Saturday.



#84 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 9,150
  • Reputation: 1,432
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:06 PM

Hummmm postal service running at a deficit every year, but changing nothing except the price of stamps....and it's still not working....wonder what that sounds like?

#85 google larry davis

google larry davis

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,650
  • Reputation: 1,317
HUDDLER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:13 PM

Donahoe says the post office needs to refinance retirement health fund payments to $1 billion a year instead of $5 billion.


oh stupid fuging conservatives are still purposefully running the USPS into the ground then huh?

#86 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 9,150
  • Reputation: 1,432
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:19 PM

oh stupid fuging conservatives are still purposefully running the USPS into the ground then huh?



Nope....just another government agency...losing tax payer money...because some stupid fuging liberal "needed" it.

See how that works....had we not created the "program" as so many liberals like to call them...then we would never have had this discussion.

#87 google larry davis

google larry davis

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,650
  • Reputation: 1,317
HUDDLER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:22 PM

you don't know anything at all about the postal accountability and enhancement act, do you?

#88 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 9,150
  • Reputation: 1,432
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:26 PM

you don't know anything at all about the postal accountability and enhancement act, do you?



What does that have to do with the liberals of this country continuing to add more and more government employees, and programs.

#89 google larry davis

google larry davis

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,650
  • Reputation: 1,317
HUDDLER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:27 PM

uh this thread is about the USPS

#90 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,498
  • Reputation: 3,562
HUDDLER

Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:52 PM

What does that have to do with the liberals of this country continuing to add more and more government employees, and programs.


yeah what about the liberals!