Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Matthias' Mock


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#16 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,584 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 22 November 2011 - 08:44 PM

I just noticed Shockey is gone too, Barnidge is our #2 TE.

#17 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • ALL-PRO
  • 11,621 posts
  • LocationConcord, NC

Posted 23 November 2011 - 01:25 AM

Wow, just wow. Regardless of what anyone wants, the Panthers would be absolutely stupid to go offense at any point with the first three picks of the draft. Hardy isn't worth a second, he's horrible in run defense at this point. At best he gets the team a 4th or 5th round pick. Smitty wont be traded, Mr. Newton wouldn't like that and this is his team now.


The defense needs at least 7 new starters and that's counting Beason coming back at full strength which isn't a given or actually very likely for next season.
Anderson, Beason, Johnson, Gamble are the only starting caliber players on this defense and you go offense first and fourth.... Argument could be made for Godfrey but that's it.

Might have something in Edwards, but there's no telling how he recovers from the injury.

Captin has to go down the DC to at least the 4th corner, need at least 1 DT, 1 OLB, 1 CB, 1 FS and imo another DE.


Defense

Johnson, Hardy
Edwards, Fua
McClain, Kearse
FA, Applewhite
Jenkings, Jason Phillips
Beason, Senn
Anderson, Kion Wilson/FA
Gamble, Hogan
Claiborne, Butler, Captin
Godfrey, Pugh
Lester, Martin

#18 Matthias

Matthias

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,054 posts

Posted 23 November 2011 - 03:37 PM

I noticed your depth chart is clausenless! We will trade him for something not just cut him. I'm mean Damn, look what Charlie Whitehurst brought in. I think we can at least get a 6th for him!



If there is a team that wants him, they will be smart enough to just wait until the Panthers release him.

#19 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,938 posts

Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:31 PM

With all due respect, this draft is highly not likely. If it did then I would nut myself! However, we do not trade Hardy to make room for oft injured Williams. Dont know where williams goes but Im pretty confident it will not be here. If he is......great. Maybe he gives us the home area discount, but hardy has to stay with the team that builds through its draft.


it is highly unlikely but it is a really awesome draft, i hate losing smith shockey and hardy though

#20 DoubleTrouble34

DoubleTrouble34

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts

Posted 24 November 2011 - 04:56 PM

lol at this draft kellen moore in the 7th? notsureifsrs

#21 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,938 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 03:56 PM

trading down with seattle to #13 and getting their first second and third and maybe some picks next year
1st round: Manti Te,o LB
2nd round: Brandon Thompson DT
2nd round: Mike Adams OT
3rd round: Billy Winn DT/DE
4th round: Devier Posey WR
5th round: Kenny Tate S/LB(maybe fil the joker position, blitzing covering tight ends spying QBs)

#22 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,398 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 05:19 PM

I liked your first 2 picks in the draft then i LOL at everything else.

#23 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,398 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 05:20 PM

That would be a grace from god if Brandon Thompson fell to the second round.

#24 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,938 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 05:37 PM

What's your particular problem with the rest of the picks

#25 Matthias

Matthias

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,054 posts

Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:59 AM

lol just started reading this

he's got Gettis at WR1 and a question mark at WR2.... yea that's a much improved WR core



I'm a little late, but I want to respond to this one. The question mark receiver will be WR1, and Gettis WR2.

#26 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,938 posts

Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:32 PM

Trade down with Cleveland get their two first round picks
1st David Decastro OG, really solidify the o-line who knows if hangman is gonna be back next year
1st Brandon thompson DT good run stuffer we could really use
2nd Whitney Mercilus DE a good d-line rotation is integral for having a good defense
4th Keenan Robinson OLB athletic freak could fit into the rotation depending on what happens with TD

#27 Clicheking

Clicheking

    Mack of the year

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,325 posts
  • Location910

Posted 01 December 2011 - 11:01 PM

This scenario is extremely unlike so I won't bother with the details, all I wanna say is Crick is a 3-4 DE.

#28 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,849 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 02 December 2011 - 02:17 AM

Terrible IMO. Stupid trades, cap nonsense, Bell isn't an OG, etc...

#29 Matthias

Matthias

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,054 posts

Posted 02 December 2011 - 04:28 PM

Trade down with Cleveland get their two first round picks
1st David Decastro OG, really solidify the o-line who knows if hangman is gonna be back next year
1st Brandon thompson DT good run stuffer we could really use
2nd Whitney Mercilus DE a good d-line rotation is integral for having a good defense
4th Keenan Robinson OLB athletic freak could fit into the rotation depending on what happens with TD





I don't trust Clemson d-lineman as of late. I also think it would be better to bring in a DT that can pass rush. I know we got McClain, but I don't know if he has it in him to become a solid star at DT.





This scenario is extremely unlike so I won't bother with the details, all I wanna say is Crick is a 3-4 DE.



Why is that? He excelled playing DT in the 4-3.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com