Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Chavez Calls on Summit to Indict George W. Bush for War Crimes


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
49 replies to this topic

#13 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:52 AM

Or does it only count if you start wars for bullshit reasons to show you have balls?

#14 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:53 AM

Reagan's only war was Grenada, and he turned tail and ran out of Lebanon, what a liberal pussy.

#15 JoCoLoco

JoCoLoco

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 06-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 262
  • Reputation: 6
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:54 AM

haha im sure gitmo is the exception to all of this right??


Prisoners of war my friend, no rights as citizens of this country, only question is whether their basic human rights are being violated-and it is still a question, no matter how much you wish every prisoner held there had been raped by U.S. soldiers and you had the photos to prove it.

When a huge scandal erupts in Saskatchewan, I'll be the first to ask for your take on the situation. This discussion, however...

#16 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:54 AM

And don't get me started on that Bush I - freaking wuss needed other countries to fight with him.

#17 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:55 AM

Prisoners of war my friend, no rights as citizens of this country, only question is whether their basic human rights are being violated-and it is still a question, no matter how much you wish every prisoner held there had been raped by U.S. soldiers and you had the photos to prove it.

When a huge scandal erupts in Saskatchewan, I'll be the first to ask for your take on the situation. This discussion, however...


They were not classified as Prisoners of War. the Geneva Convention was suspended unilaterally anyways. Maybe you should do minimum research on a topic before discussing?

#18 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,983
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:04 AM

Reagan's only war was Grenada, and he turned tail and ran out of Lebanon, what a liberal pussy.


Take it back.

#19 JoCoLoco

JoCoLoco

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 06-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 262
  • Reputation: 6
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:04 AM

No need to get fussy about it-if President Awesome has his way, those poor downtrodden freedom fighters will be coming soon to a Federal Prison near you. That way you can send them care packages and show up at visiting hours to do arts and crafts with them. I hear they love play-doh, when they can't get plastique. You never know, we might even free-range some of 'em...

#20 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:07 AM

Ah, yes, forget the fact that you don't know what you are talking about and predict dire consequences as a result of people not listening to what you don't know what you are talking about.

#21 JoCoLoco

JoCoLoco

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 06-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 262
  • Reputation: 6
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:15 AM

And what dire consequence did I predict in the previous thread? I might have agreed had you said "implied the possibility of dire consequences," but maybe I put too much stock in the ability to specify.

#22 CanadianCat

CanadianCat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 713
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:49 AM

When a huge scandal erupts in Saskatchewan, I'll be the first to ask for your take on the situation. This discussion, however...


see your off topic already. were not talking about an isolated incident, what were talking about is that the former president of 8 years (the guy that your country liked so much that you kept him in power as long as possible) was so corrupt that he should be convicted for war crimes.

the thing is, its not like 1 or 2 people are debating this issue, this is global news...

#23 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,926
  • Reputation: 2,615
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:22 AM

And what dire consequence did I predict in the previous thread? I might have agreed had you said "implied the possibility of dire consequences," but maybe I put too much stock in the ability to specify.


The generic implied threat of sudden doom - guiding Republican politics since Goldwater!

#24 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,030
  • Reputation: 443
HUDDLER

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:25 AM

The generic implied threat of sudden doom - guiding Republican politics since Goldwater!


Johnson's campaign was worse than Goldwater's.