Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Chavez Calls on Summit to Indict George W. Bush for War Crimes


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#16 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:54 AM

And don't get me started on that Bush I - freaking wuss needed other countries to fight with him.

#17 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:55 AM

Prisoners of war my friend, no rights as citizens of this country, only question is whether their basic human rights are being violated-and it is still a question, no matter how much you wish every prisoner held there had been raped by U.S. soldiers and you had the photos to prove it.

When a huge scandal erupts in Saskatchewan, I'll be the first to ask for your take on the situation. This discussion, however...


They were not classified as Prisoners of War. the Geneva Convention was suspended unilaterally anyways. Maybe you should do minimum research on a topic before discussing?

#18 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:04 AM

Reagan's only war was Grenada, and he turned tail and ran out of Lebanon, what a liberal pussy.


Take it back.

#19 JoCoLoco

JoCoLoco

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 262 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:04 AM

No need to get fussy about it-if President Awesome has his way, those poor downtrodden freedom fighters will be coming soon to a Federal Prison near you. That way you can send them care packages and show up at visiting hours to do arts and crafts with them. I hear they love play-doh, when they can't get plastique. You never know, we might even free-range some of 'em...

#20 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:07 AM

Ah, yes, forget the fact that you don't know what you are talking about and predict dire consequences as a result of people not listening to what you don't know what you are talking about.

#21 JoCoLoco

JoCoLoco

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 262 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:15 AM

And what dire consequence did I predict in the previous thread? I might have agreed had you said "implied the possibility of dire consequences," but maybe I put too much stock in the ability to specify.

#22 CanadianCat

CanadianCat

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 707 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:49 AM

When a huge scandal erupts in Saskatchewan, I'll be the first to ask for your take on the situation. This discussion, however...


see your off topic already. were not talking about an isolated incident, what were talking about is that the former president of 8 years (the guy that your country liked so much that you kept him in power as long as possible) was so corrupt that he should be convicted for war crimes.

the thing is, its not like 1 or 2 people are debating this issue, this is global news...

#23 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:22 AM

And what dire consequence did I predict in the previous thread? I might have agreed had you said "implied the possibility of dire consequences," but maybe I put too much stock in the ability to specify.


The generic implied threat of sudden doom - guiding Republican politics since Goldwater!

#24 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:25 AM

The generic implied threat of sudden doom - guiding Republican politics since Goldwater!


Johnson's campaign was worse than Goldwater's.

#25 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,073 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:28 AM

What war crimes would he be charged with?

#26 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 11:38 AM

What war crimes would he be charged with?


failure to turn left
running a stop sign

#27 CanadianCat

CanadianCat

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 707 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 12:15 PM

What war crimes would he be charged with?


- authorized the use of torture and abuse in violation of international humanitarian and human rights law and domestic constitutional and statutory law.

- authorized the transfer (“rendition”) of persons held in U.S. custody to foreign countries where torture is known to be practiced.

-authorized the indefinite detention of persons seized in foreign combat zones and in other countries far from any combat zone and denied them the protections of the Geneva Conventions

all in all there are 269 war crimes 'they' are trying to get him for....

try watching news other then cnn or fox. you probably still believe that russia started the war in georgia....

#28 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 12:25 PM

Everyone knows that Lincoln started the war in Georgia because he was an aggressive Federalist. Oh, Tara!

#29 Htar

Htar

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 08:08 PM

Ah, yes, forget the fact that you don't know what you are talking about and predict dire consequences as a result of people not listening to what you don't know what you are talking about.


HAHA! As if you know what you're talking about...You flew Kennedy out there as if he did a damn thing right...Bay of Pigs, Allowed the Berlin wall to go up under his watch, poo his pants with the Cuban Missile crisis and got lucky that they backed down. He wouldn't have done poo if they had followed through.

I'll grant you FDR, but he still started us down the road to socialism, and that fact negates a lot.

#30 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 06 April 2009 - 10:05 PM

- authorized the use of torture and abuse in violation of international humanitarian and human rights law and domestic constitutional and statutory law.

- authorized the transfer (“rendition”) of persons held in U.S. custody to foreign countries where torture is known to be practiced.

-authorized the indefinite detention of persons seized in foreign combat zones and in other countries far from any combat zone and denied them the protections of the Geneva Conventions

all in all there are 269 war crimes 'they' are trying to get him for....

try watching news other then cnn or fox. you probably still believe that russia started the war in georgia....



Russia WAS the invading country.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com